Unpaywalled Version: https://archive.ph/n9NWZ

With increasing dogmatism on the far right, ideology that should have become extinct rears its ugly head. If we don’t stop this, a lot of innocent people will get hurt in the end.

    • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Margaret Sanger, founder of planned parent hood, was a racists and huge supporter of eugenics, she even spoke at Klan meetings. In 1939 she started “The Negro Project”, a plan to target black communities. Here are some of her quotes.

      We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population…" – Letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, December 10, 1939, p. 2

      “Apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”- from “My Way to Peace,” Jan. 17, 1932. Margaret Sanger Papers, Library of Congress 130:198.

      “Permits for parenthood shall be issued upon application by city, county, or state authorities to married couples, providing they are financially able to support the expected child, have the qualifications needed for proper rearing of the child, have no transmissible diseases, and, on the woman’s part, no medical indication that maternity is likely to result in death or permanent injury to health.” – Margaret Sanger, “America Needs a Code for Babies,” Article 5, March 27, 1934.

      “Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives… If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must precede motherhood in every individual woman.” — “Woman and the New Race,” 1920

      • a_queer_one@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think many people aware of the history of Planned Parenthood would argue Margaret Sanger didn’t advocate eugenics, including Planned Parenthood

        https://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/our-history

        “Margaret Sanger’s racism and belief in eugenics are in direct opposition to Planned Parenthood’s mission. Planned Parenthood denounces Margaret Sanger’s belief in eugenics. Further, Planned Parenthood denounces the history and legacy of anti-Blackness in gynecology and the reproductive rights movement, and the mistreatment that continues against Black, Indigenous, and other people of color in this country.”

        Turns out that an organization can engage in self reflection and change beliefs over a century

        • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t you dare say something like that, don’t you know that once you espouse a certain way of life it’s impossible to change yourself or your world view?

          That’s how republicans work, so everything in the world must work this way as well!!

          /s

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          PP denied and justified Sanger’s ideas up until 3 years ago before that she was just allaying with the eugenics movement to further her goals.

          Convincing undesirables that they shouldn’t have children sure seems to align with PP’s values. It seems PP just broadened their views to the “poors” and not just raced based.

            • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              PP finally removed Sanger’s name from Manhattan Health Center in 2020.

              https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/22/us/margaret-sanger-planned-parenthood-trnd/index.html

              “The removal of Margaret Sanger’s name from our building is both a necessary and overdue step to reckon with our legacy and acknowledge Planned Parenthood’s contributions to historical reproductive harm within communities of color,” said Karen Seltzer, the chair of PPGNY’s board. “Margaret Sanger’s concerns and advocacy for reproductive health have been clearly documented, but so too has her racist legacy.”

              • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s doesn’t exactly support your claim, or at least not very well. That article is light on the details, but from the sound of it, Sanger’s name was on a plaque of some sort, and her name isn’t exactly super well known, nor is her racist history, so it’s sounds like it was more or less forgotten. Second, a plaque within a single building doesn’t automatically reflect the values of an entire organization.

                There are still confederate statues around, does that reflect the values of all american cities? No, of course not.

                There are Carnegie libraries all over my city. Do those libraries hold the values that Carnegie did? Not really.

                It just doesn’t make sense to label an entire organization as racist, let alone jump to the claim that “eugenics is still very popular” based off of one plaque on one building of one organization.

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure.

        But Planned Parenthood neither is nor prescribes a “stern rigid policy of sterilization and segregation” to anybody. And on that endeavor, it’s clear she failed spectacularly.

        Furthermore, modern Planned Parenthood espouses feminist values, which are in direct opposition to the ideals of eugenics and segregation.

        I don’t think Sanger’s original mission is even remotely applicable to the modern organization. So, I can’t really see how it is currently racist, even if that’s how it started.

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really relevant but modern femist values are agnostic to racial segregation.

          Sanger’s style of eugenics is compatible with PP’s modern values, convincing the undesirables the best option for them is not to reproduce. Forced eugenics was not Sanger’s style she was a coerced eugenics kind of gal.

          Up until 3 or 4 years ago Sanger was still beatified inside PP. Her actions and message was downplayed and justified.

          • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            modern femist values are agnostic to racial segregation.

            Maybe modern white feminist values are, like more women in the boardrooms. The rest of it is diametrically opposed to racial segregation.

            • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Feminists may be opposed to racial segregation, like most people, but it’s not a value of feminism. Equality of the sexes has nothing to do with race.

              • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Equality of the sexes has nothing to do with race.

                It absolutely does. Women of color as significantly worse off in a multitude of ways than white women. There is absolutely an effect of race on the treatment of women. So equality of sex is absolutely related to race.

                On top of that, it is strategically better to ally yourself with people who you share common cause, which in this case is equality.