Unpaywalled Version: https://archive.ph/n9NWZ

With increasing dogmatism on the far right, ideology that should have become extinct rears its ugly head. If we don’t stop this, a lot of innocent people will get hurt in the end.

    • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It wasn’t just a plaque on some wall they were removing, 2020 is when they finally denounced her.

      • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok, that still doesn’t address the root of my argument, so I will ask it in a different way.

        Can you prove that planned parenthood was explicitly embracing Sanger for her eugenics beliefs, instead of her beliefs about the importance of reproductive rights?

        For example, people in this country openly embrace George Washington. Yet he was a slaver. He had slaves. But the people who see George Washington as a source of good for our country typically don’t include the slavery part as the good part.

        Would you consider organizations that honor George Washington to be racist?

        • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your George Washington straw man misses the mark, he didn’t fight for slaves. It’s more like beatifying General Lee, slave owner and general for the confederacy. I would say people that support General Lee are racists.

          I don’t have to prove PP publicly approved of Sanger’s eugenics. They knew about her past, celebrated her and tried to down play her racists ramblings up until 3 years ago. Their current statement on her should have happened 40 years ago.

          • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Your George Washington straw man misses the mark, he didn’t fight for slaves.

            That’s not the basis for my comparison, and therefore not relevant. The basis for comparison was that he, just like Sanger, is a historical figure that did a lot of good, while also doing a lot of bad.

            “I don’t have to prove republicans publicly approved of Washington’s slavery and slaughter of the natives. They know about his past, celebrate him, and continue to this day to try to down play his racist actions.”

            Do you still not see the problem here?

            Would you consider organizations that honor George Washington to be racist?

            • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Washington did not fight for slavery, did not advicate for it, and infact freed all the slaves he owned. He was not a champion of slavery. Sanger viewed abortion and birth control as a means to stop the undesirables from reproducing. She championed eugenics, PP was just a side effect of her goals.

              • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You still haven’t answered my question.

                Would you consider organizations that honor George Washington to be racist?

                  • PizzaMan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    He had slaves. And that was racist regardless of his opinion on the matter. He explicitly called for the genocide of natives.