• RubiksIsocahedron@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now why would I do that. Humanity aside that’s strategically unsound: Fearful people are not at the full extent of their abilities. And if we are are to, what, hunt mammoths or some shit I’d rather have you at your best.

    You know goddamned why; you’re not fooling me. You hate me because I prove your belief that that you’re inferior. And you don’t want me “at your best” because that results in me killing you the next time you attack me.

    on the contrary, they want to see you fly and soar

    That would be suicidal for them. Do you expect me to believe they’re openly suicidal?

    How do you clearly distinguish between those ends people aim for?

    No one is trying to “get me out of there” and anyone who’s trying to convince there is is exactly the people I need to destroy first - because they are the boldest liars.

    “Everyone is out to get me” is not an answer to that question, it’s a cop-out, it’s avoidance.

    That’s your strawman.

    If there was a single decent human being among the billions we are, and you might just by chance stumble across them one day… would you be able to tell that they’re the exception?

    It wouldn’t matter, because a single person wouldn’t make a difference. In fact, the idea of a “single person” is an oxymoron; an “individual” is just meat. Personhood comes from group membership; no “individual” is a “person” until a group recognizes them as such.

    The social atom is the group, no the individual bag of meat. A human being’s worth literally comes from the group; one’s own estimate of worth is hopelessly biased and therefore perfectly invalid.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You hate me because I prove your belief that that you’re inferior.

      Was that a Freudian slip?

      Just for the record, no, I do not think of myself as inferior. Or superior. I generally don’t tend to think it those categories and definitely not as a generality. If there’s a shoemaker, sure, I’ll recognise their authority when it comes to the question of shoes.

      And you don’t want me “at your best” because that results in me killing you the next time you attack me.

      Why would I attack you? As I said in the beginning: No amount of flailing will make me hate you. Any aggression will have to be started from your side.

      • RubiksIsocahedron@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Was that a Freudian slip?

        …no? I didn’t write it wrong.

        I do not think of myself as inferior. Or superior.

        Sure you don’t.

        Why would I attack you? As I said in the beginning: No amount of flailing will make me hate you.

        And as I have said throughout: I won’t take anything you say at face value. You have no reason to talk to me if you’re not trying to lie to me somehow.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I do not think of myself as inferior. Or superior.

          Sure you don’t.

          If you do not consider that possible, I suggest you suspend disbelief. Try it out for yourself.

          As I already linked Epictetus:

          These reasonings are unconnected: “I am richer than you, therefore I am better”; “I am more eloquent than you, therefore I am better.” The connection is rather this: “I am richer than you, therefore my property is greater than yours;” “I am more eloquent than you, therefore my style is better than yours.” But you, after all, are neither property nor style.