• eltimablo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those byproducts are still viable as fuel and can be sent to second- and third-stage reactors rather than being locked away in a cement vault somewhere. Also, Australia has an absolute shitload of uranium out in the outback, which is kind of a win-win since it’s far from civilization and largely uninhabitable anyway. If the fuel actually gets used until it’s spent, nuclear is extremely clean and very safe.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if these reactors are built and used and we get the uranium from better sources, there’s still the teeny tiny problem of nuclear being insanely expensive per kWh.

      • tetraodon@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nuclear is expensive, is problematic. However, it can replace fossil base load production, which renewables so far aren’t able to do. Unless we’re talking storage, which is even more expensive than nuclear, as well as having its own pollution problems.

      • eltimablo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not been my experience. I live near one of the largest nuclear plants in the world and I pay a pittance for electricity compared to other areas I’ve lived.

        Edit: Just checked my bill. I pay 8 cents per kWh, which is magnificent compared to the 12-14 I paid at my old place.

        • legofreak@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You cannot take your very localised and anecdotal experience and draw conclusions about energy cost as a whole. There are many reasons why your electricity now is cheaper than at a different place at a different time.

          Besides, nuclear is very expensive compared to other energy sources, it is however often heavily subsidised. Wikipedia has a nice summary on the cost of various electricity sources.
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

    • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that uranium is so cheap nobody wants to use non-virgin fuel. You could recycle the uranium, or use breeder reactors, but both of those have political issues. The current usage of uranium is extremely wasteful and produces lots of unnecessary waste, but I’m not totally convinced that this will change anytime soon.

      • eltimablo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that it won’t change anytime soon. Even if the laws changed overnight it would be decades before we had a full pipeline. That said, I don’t consider that a reason not to pursue the research and development of one, or to stop the construction of nuclear plants that’s already in progress.