• cogman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No disagreement, it would be a major blow to russia. I just don’t think it would have ended the war. The navy simply hasn’t played a major role in this war.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      They fire missiles from those ships. Also can prevent grain exports from Ukraine which has a major impact on the economic war.

      Significant damage to the Black Sea fleet would make it clear to many in Russia that Putin is weak which makes a coup more likely. Continuing this war is not in Russia’s best interests it’s only in Putin’s interests (admitting defeat also makes him look weak. A coup in Russia likely ends the war.

      Certainly it’s not something that would automatically end the war, but it significantly increases the probability of the war ending sooner. And there is significant strategic value to that fleet even if it’s not directly engaged in combat.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      the navy acts as mobile missile bases, they also allow Russia to move supplies by water, with there only being 2 land routes to most of the front, the ability to use shipping to bypass blockades, the sinking of the Russian fleet would also have allowed Ukrainians to more easily destroy the bridge between Russia and Crimea, this would make 80%+ of Russian positions in Ukraine untenable in terms of holding militarily, and since Putin can’t afford to lose half his army in just a few months he would be forced to pull out and negotiate.