• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    No restart require on Linux is a joke, right? Because I get updates that require restarts as often as I get them on Windows when updating Mint.

    • Camille@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless you’re updating the kernel itself, there is little chance you actually need to reboot your machine. Just restarting whatever service or application you’re using should do the trick.

        • Camille@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          You do you, it can’t hurt to reboot and work on a fresh restart. But if for some reasons you need to keep your machine up, you’ll know it is less of a problem than on windows typically

        • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Kde neon made me reboot Everytime it updated. Turns out there was a setting I could disable. Afterwards I was never bugged about rebooting.

          Used discover for updates

          Maybe you have such a setting?

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is the same on Windows, you can just carry on and then complete an update when you go to shut down the machine. Can’t remember the last time an app install or update required the whole OS to be restarted immediately.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          I remember what it’s called, but at some point there was an app for windows that would check if your machine actually needed a restart or not. Basically the “restart your machine” prompt is mostly just a boilerplate. It’s very rare that those installers touch anything that can’t actually be loaded without a restart.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          Except when it force closes your computer when you dismiss the windows update too many times

        • Ziglin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I tried installing rust which required some Visual Studio compiler on a Windows machine configured to reset itself when rebooted. It decided I needed a reboot. I’m glad I didn’t have unsaved files…

          Needless to say I could not run my program on that machine. Why does it need a reboot? I don’t know. It’s just meant to be a compiler.

              • Ziglin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                29 days ago

                Been running endeavouros for over a year on two machines. The only time I couldn’t boot was when the Nvidia drivers decided not to work with the LTS kernel anymore. So I just started the normal kernel and changed that to the default in my boot manager. This is the only issue I’ve had with it and it’s arch based. I really don’t understand the bad reputation.

                Also the arch wiki is applicable to most distros with only slight changes.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        Even with kernel updates, you can use something like ksplice or kpatch to update it without rebooting. It’s usually only used on servers though.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Besides a kernel update… Which one?

      Honest question, as I usually just restart to be sure I haven’t missed to restart a service or something, but theoretically I could restart every program and service, that got updated.

      Maybe Mint is very conservative here…

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Afaik mint just says you have to restart but don’t forces you. Iirc it was there to avoud any glitches which could be caused by apps interacting with each other in different versions(say some system app got updated and desktop environment is still the old since its loaded before update then cause gui mismatch due to different versions of ui toolkit)

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        I mean, in this case Windows doesn’t force you to restart either, you can just keep chugging along with the restart icon at the bottom right… That icon can stay there for weeks on my girlfriend’s laptop

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          But that is update and restart. The update is not at all installed and will only install if you restart. And it takes a lot of time. But here it is already installed and you can actually reopen apps ti get them in the updated state

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep. I’m on EndeavourOS which is about as far as you can get from Mint without going to like Slackware, LFS, or BSD. Basically every single run of pacman prompts for a reboot. I’m sure I could restart individual services or subsystems instead, but that’s not what the OS popup says.

      • Despotic Machine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Redhat is not the original. Just of the ongoing projects, there is both Slackware and Debian, which are both older than Redhat. Redhat stands out because they are a commercial, for profit company, so they have more money and resources to invest in Linux development than most organizations, and they have a vested interest since it is their product base.