🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1373arrow-down136
arrow-up1337arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 22 hours agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up37arrow-down1·13 hours ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up24·13 hours agoI stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
minus-squareclickyello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 hours agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.