Summary

Republicans have won control of both the House and Senate, solidifying their alignment with President-elect Donald Trump and his aggressive “America First” agenda.

Trump’s allies, including new House Speaker Mike Johnson, aim to overhaul federal programs, enact conservative policies, and investigate Trump’s legal adversaries.

Trump nominated loyalist Rep. Matt Gaetz as attorney general, raising concerns among Democrats and some Republicans.

The GOP’s slim House majority could complicate legislative unity, while the Senate’s 53-seat majority provides leeway for confirming Trump’s Cabinet, including potential Supreme Court nominees.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Well, in 2 and 4 years when they have accomplished nothing useful despite have all three branches, people will be ready for a big change. At least I can hope, right.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That’s not the victory Republicans will think it is.

    The House Freedom caucus routinely has at least one or two who dig their heels in over “this bill doesn’t go FAR enough!”

    With a 218 majority, that means 100% of the Republicans have to toe the line. Not a single person can be out of line, something that rarely happens with either party. There’s usually at least ONE person who doesn’t like the outcome.

    This is going to put a lot of people who are known for digging in their heels into very precarious situations. Either they toe the line and have to accept some compromise because of Democrats in the Senate looking to filibuster. Or they alone hijack the Republican plans.

    And woe if someone dies, gets sick, or retires in office on their side, something that also happens at least once per year on either side.

    • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Are you saying that it was…dare I say…RIGGED?!!

      THERE IS NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THAT ELECTIONS IN THE US CAN BE RIGGED!!!

      • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well, you start by legitimately winning an election by stoking fear. In Russia it was bombing an apartment block and blaming it on Chechens, in the US it’s… the possibility of electing a woman

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          People: America is too racist to elect a black man.

          Black man runs as a progressive and wins two consecutive elections handily.

          People: America is too misogynistic to elect a woman.

          Two women run as neo-liberals and lose, one gets crushed.

          People: See? Women are too controversial.

          • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            How absolutely DARE you!!

            They are women!! Their policy positions should not have had ANYTHING to do with the vote!! Everyone should have voted for them because they are women!!

        • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Stoking fear? Like telling everyone that if you vote a certain way, it will be the LITERAL downfall of not only US civilization, but of civilization on the entire mother fucking PLANET!? Like stoking fear by saying that if they vote a certain way that LITERAL DEATH CAMPS will be common place? Like telling people that they are going to LITERALLY LOSE ALL OF THEIR RIGHTS!!? Like telling people that YOU ARE LITERALLY VOTING FOR LITERALLY HITLER!!!?

          Like that kind of stoking fear?

          • shani66@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Difference there is that most of the fear of trump in the white house is based on the things he himself has said and already done.

            • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              …already done.

              You understand that he was President once already?

              And that you guys said all of the same shit the first time around?

              And here we still are?

              Member?! I member!!

          • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Wasn’t SOOOO cute when families were ripped apart after 2016. Kids were kept in cages. You remember that little peccadillo, Covid .

            Fuck off

            • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I remember when Obama was doing that. I also remember when even MSNBC was boasting that the Biden administration deported more people than Trump did, ON ELECTION NIGHT! They were parading that stat around like it was the best thing ever!

              Oh, you guys just don’t like it when it’s a non Democrat that is putting up record deportation numbers?

              Got it!

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Since much of that can be shown by simply quoting things Trump says verbatim, what are you on about and why are there so many random bold words?

            • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Are you implying that Trump has “verbatim” said that we will have “death camps”? And that we will “loose all our rights”? And that “he is Hitler”?

              Source please.

              “Why are there so many randomly bold words?” Sorry, I was just trying to match the tone of the room. Nobody listens to you unless you are screaming in their face that they are “literally being assaulted” on the internet. Also, I have to give you SOMETHING to attack beside the actual point! Sure, it’s my formatting that is the REAL problem!

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    aim to overhaul federal programs, enact conservative policies, and investigate Trump’s legal adversaries.

    “America First” was always an oxymoron. MAGA always means great for certain people. It’s going to be surreal to have to listen to both the gloating of tasting liberal tears while asking why the Democrats aren’t doing anything to help the country.

  • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The continuation of draining the swamp by…

    Replacing it with THEIR swamp, yeah! That’s how it goes! /s

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I personally think draining the swamp is an apt metaphor… wetlands are critical environments, so draining the swamp evokes the anti-environmental bent of the republicans, as well as a metaphor for their erosion of our democratic institutions. Not that a trumpet would see the irony