• Muntjac@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grossi asserted that he “didn’t see that kind of development” on the ground, but also that “anything can happen, that is what worries me”.

      IAEA is not confirming it, but I think it’s a stretch to get “pure deranged nonsense” from that quote.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            In the opinion of any sane person, and what IAEA says is that there is no substance to the conspiracy theory being peddled here.

            • Muntjac@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is fascinating how personal biases shape our communications and beliefs.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Right, Russia just keeps blowing up their own pipelines, dams and nuclear power plants. Imagine being a grown ass adult and actually believing that. When nord stream was blown up all the media in the west screeched that it was Russia who did it. Now slowly admissions are coming out that it wasn’t Russia. Yet, here we are again each time a piece of infrastructure Russia controls is under attack, people inexplicably think that Russia destroyed it.

                  • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The leading theory with the nord stream pipeline explosion is that putin ordered it to make “business as usual” not an option for those in russias political sphere who would have prefered the resumption of gas to europe over Putins goals in Ukraine. no pipeline, no way back. ultimately no one knows for sure who did it but thanks for bringing it up.

                    “Now slowly admissions are coming out that it wasn’t Russia.”

                    nope. Russia is still the lead suspect.

                    Russia blew up the nova khakovka dam in an attempt to stop Ukrainians launching amphibious assaults accross the dniepr and taking their land back.

                    Now that Ukrainians have a foothold on the left bank of the dniepr near Kherson all of a sudden there is talk of a radiation release from the NNP conveniently placed westwards of kherson with easterly and south easterly prevailing winds.

            • ElegantBiscuit@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Russia has claimed to destroy more of every system than the west has sent, before they were even fully sent. Visually confirmed loss data has proven that Russia lies consistently about loss ratios vs Ukraine and number of systems and personnel lost, and have been throughout the entire war. Ukraine lies to some degree too, but no where near as much the Russians lie. You can believe me if you want, and I know you probably won’t, but for everyone else reading, anyone telling you to take the russian claims as truth (or Ukrainian for that matter, or anywhere that isn’t open source and/or transparent about its methodology with plenty of proof to back it up), is probably lying to you, either willfully or ignorantly.