Depends if you’re hungry.

Fly it high.

They’ll let you live in these than stack you one on top of the other on a container ship headed to sea and forget about you.

The contradictions in that last example.

Spy balloon found incapable of spying.

Orcocracy’s razor.

Stocks in left over black ink from all those old inkjet printers found in landfill sites increase GDP by 4pts this year as it’s revealed that adding a bit of water brings then back to liquid.

…

Turmoil in Britain this week as Nestlé refuses to let the British use water for bathing, choosing instead to sell Britain’s waterways to the highest bidder—second-hand ink manufacturers. The price increase of Nestlé shares raise GDP another 3pts.

That’s only a problem for those who demand exponential growth. And your assumptions are based on the unsustainable model of western imperialism; as China implements it’s green energy, transport, automated agriculture, and housing policies, those sectors won’t need to keep ‘growing’ as they do in capitalist states to prop up GDP. Even if it’s right that if the slowing rate of growth leads to a net GDP shrinkage, it doesn’t portend collapse.

That’s not counting the effect of BRICS+ and the BRI on interpreting GDP. You don’t need such a high GDP when you cooperate with your neighbours, when your GDP isn’t a measure of how much you bully your neighbours and oppress your foreign and domestic workforce.

Many have repeatedly and outstandingly wrongly claimed either bluntly or in what they think is ‘clever’ subtleness that China is about to collapse. Do you really want to be in that crowd when the music stops?

If it wasn’t collapsing, it wouldn’t be in the red.

And when you catch them out, they say, ‘Yeah but they had to lay low for a bit because it wasn’t safe’.

I think it was an octopus. Just not an antisemitic one.

Or breakroom, by the sound of it.

Western imperialists know that a dedicated weak backwards slum fuelled by corruption could bring down their house of cards version of a weak backwards slum fuelled by corruption.

I do believe Ukraine was made to accept the fact of defeat almost straight away. I don’t expect Hannan to comprehend that.

Shit, I thought they were just over a year apart not two days apart lol. Mayhem.

Is 70ft far enough when it comes to the British?

As in, the press functions as the police by enforcing the dominant narrative?

I already hear it used in that way, even in polite company.

The modlog is public. You can see exactly what comment led to the ban if you search for it.

The US state department lawyers and the British House of Lords have evidence. That’s why they’re pursuing convictions of the Chinese leaders involved. No, wait— sorry, I misremembered. They both concluded there is insufficient evidence.

Is it good? Other than the theme song?