• blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even if it doesnt have much impact on activitypub-fedi, I think this is good news for the fediverse in general. X is loosing more and more relevancy and microblogging is more and more happening on federating services.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m having trouble figuring out how bluesky is part of the fediverse at all.

      From my understanding it doesn’t federate with anything.

      It’s like saying a hamburger is really just a cheeseburger…you just need to add cheese.

        • asudox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh great. That bridge even federates with the bitcoin bros’ network (nostr)

          • I really like the Nostr protocol, though. It’s too bad the network is so inundated by cryptocurrency topics.

            It’s simple, it has a nice extension process (standing on the shoulders of giants), and it’s super easy and lightweight to self-host. It reminds me a lot of the early days of http, when it was more common (as a developer) to telnet to port 80 and just type in a couple of lines of header and get a response.

            Sadly, Nostr’s association with cryptocurrency, and the fact that 90% of the traffic on it is cryptocurrency created posts, has been a severe handicap.

      • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        In theory, bluesky can federate with other apps but it is currently the only one using their protocol, bluesky servers can federate with each other and when a new project using atprotocol appears it will probably be able to federate with that