• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tape speed / recording quality. Frames on VHS are diagonal stripes from one edge to the other. At lower tape speeds, those stripes get shorter and closer together. The horizontal resolution is unavoidably reduced. Color information gets muddy, because that’s some deep magic in a black-and-white signal. Adjacent frames can bleed into one another. Worst of all, you’re more likely to get tracking problems, where the ridiculous wheels-in-wheels of the diagonal / helical read mechanism get misaligned with the stripes, and the whole picture can drop out.

        • zedgeist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You wrote a really long and interesting response that completely failed to answer the question. What’s SP in this context?

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nope. The tape travels a shorter distance in each 60th of a second, so there’s a steeper diagonal between the start and end of each frame. The whole magnetic pattern gets scrunched.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I think I don’t understand the stripes thing. so it’s a diagonal stripe. are the edges of the tape the sides of the screen or the top and bottom of the screen? what do you mean by steeper? is there a a gap between frames? how is the gap created? why would putting less information onto the tape (standard play vs long play) cause less readable data and lower quality? usually packing more into a given space makes quality worse.

                  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Getting a millennial to explain CRTs is the free space in our bingo card.

                    Okay, so: tube televisions are a glass bulb containing vacuum. There’s an electron beam at the back, and electromagnets steer that beam in straight lines left to right, from the top of the screen to the bottom, every single frame. But in-between each straight line there’s a brief “blanking interval” where the beam has to move to the next line. The video signal itself goes dark during these periods. There’s a longer “vertical blank” when the beam moves from the bottom-right corner back to the upper-left.

                    VHS encodes one sequence of lines, one frame, from the top edge of the tape to the bottom edge of the tape. The tape is pulled around a drum, and inside the drum, there’s a read-write head spinning perpendicular. If the tape stopped then it’d overwrite the same vertical stripe across the tape, top to bottom, over and over. But because the tape is moving around the drum, it writes each stripe diagonally, slightly separated from the previous stripe.

                    It’s okay to lose some signal between the bottom of one stripe and the top of the next, because there’s not supposed to be any signal. That’s the vertical blank.

                    Magnetic media has limited “response.” You can only cram so much signal onto it before everything smears together, and you lose information. When VHS moves the tape more slowly, each stripe is closer to vertical, and also closer to its adjacent stripes.

                    Limited response is the reason for all of this. Industrial video recording just records linearly - like audio cassettes. But to do that, the tape has to move much faster, to avoid losing information. Studio-quality tapes come on enormous reels. VHS is compact, and moves at a more manageable speed, because the head moves quickly, even though the tape does not.

      • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think we used a different term for it, so maybe that’s a regional abbreviation. But I’m thinking they were talking about the recording quality/speed. I remember there being two options, one gave you twice as many hours but the quality was lower.

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          From memory, SP was standard play, LP was long play, and SLP was super long play.

          You could get 6 hours on a tape with SLP, but only 2 hours on SP.