Just thinking, is the art style only symbolic of the universe or is everything actually like that in-universe?

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    They see themselves like that but that’s also their reality, they don’t know otherwise.

    • dch82@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      You occasionally get situations when the animators switch the art style every now and then, but the characters still exist in the same universe, so I wonder if the characters wonder why everything looks slightly different.

        • clubb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Inside Out is a great example of just that. While I couldn’t find the scene, here’s an excerpt from tvtropes.com:

          *Entering the Abstract Thought Chamber in Inside Out caused the characters to turn into 2D figures with increasingly less defined shapes. *

          If I remember correctly, the characters actually acknowledge the shift to less detailed artstyles.

          • Mothra@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fair, there are several examples of characters acknowledging the shift in very specific circumstances. Often said circumstances are plot related one way or another.

            But usually that’s not the case, and if you have a change of art because now it’s a different studio producing the animation or they release a new season with a different art director and budget then no, it’s implied that the aesthetic status quo has always been the same.

  • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    In “Treehouse of Horror VI” Homer becomes 3D and comments how he’s “so bulky”.

    • Edgarallenpwn [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      And the first thing he did in the 3D world was go to an erotic bakery. I always thought it was a dumb throwaway joke but after thinking about it, that would be a fun first experience in the 3D world

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The other characters are quite perplexed about the idea of 3D, too, not just the stupid Homer. A scientist gives a brief lecture, similar to how scientists IRL introduce 4D.

      Anyway, that answers the good old question “Is the gruesome cartoon Itchy & Scratchy photorealistic from the Simpson’s POV?”

      • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Photorealistic: yes. However, it could be debatable whether it’s gruesome. We see situations that characters survive with short term damage but no long term consequences (example: Homer skating into the canyon). So while it would be gruesome to us, it’s probably closer to slapstick to them.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember something with a cartoon character commenting on how live-action people look kind of disturbing and surreal. They noticed the difference, and it didn’t sit well with them. Their own uncanny valley.

  • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    It depends on the author! Authors create symbolic universes and they get to choose the rules of those universes. You can read Robert McKee’s work for more on this.

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Art style. But they don’t notice it the same way you dont notice art style of people around you, and fish don’t notice the water.

  • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    In Star Trek SNW’s crossover episode with Lower Decks (cartoon), Boimler’s first comment when he meets the crew from SNW is that they look “very realistic”

    • Klear@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And eventually it is explained that they see the world as animated because they are all permanently drunk.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    In Peanuts, all adults would sound like “wah wah, wha wah wha wah wha wah”, to which the children would respond as if they made perfect sense.

    Then again, I prefer thinking about your second possibility so I’m going with that one:-).

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not an authority on this but I believe that objectively a character WILL look like “that” but when viewed subjectively they look like “this”. So, in short, to answer your question: yes, but not really. I hope this helps.

  • NevelioKrejall@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Centaurworld is a pretty good example of characters being aware of their own animation style as one character slowly transforms between the two.