• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does it really matter what the rate is when they don’t pay it anyway?

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/03/13/companies-spend-more-executive-salaries-than-taxes/72941207007/

    "The analysis names 35 corporations, including Tesla, Netflix and Ford, that each reportedly spent more on compensation to their five highest-paid executives than they paid in federal income taxes over five years.

    Collectively, the 35 corporations spent $9.5 billion on their top executives over that span, the report said, while their combined federal tax bill came to -$1.8 billion: a collective refund."

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Imagine if the law was no more can be spent in corporate executive compensation than the company pays in taxes. Idk if that’s a good idea for small corporations, but it’s a jumping off point.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As much as I like the idea it aint exactly a clean cut rule, a lot of companies operate on slim marjins due to loans or just that being how it is so taxing income could fuck over way more than just the greedy assholes. I do think taxing based off of stock prices should be a thing, the stocks reflect the physical value right? That means they should be able to pay the taxes.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I mean, when I pay my taxes, it’s based on how much money I earned, not how much money I have left over at the end of the year.

              If the argument is “Corporations are people, my friend” they should be paying an income tax, same as anyone else.

              • DeanFogg@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                30 days ago

                Holy shit if a corporation is a person…

                …does this mean a person is a corporation?

      • schema@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        It makes sense. More income, more bonus. It would also prevent companies from handing out bonuses while operating at a loss.

    • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I gotta tell ya, “is planning on increasing corporate taxes” seems like the right direction to me. So, yes.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, there’s more to be done, obviously.

      For someone who clearly knows how fucked the issue is that wording seems almost distracting from the road that will get us to a solution. It’s a good thing, let it happen.