• WindInTrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty clear from your comments that you do support it. Why are you trying to hide that now?

    • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m all for massive gun control reform. I’m also all for minorities being allowed to arm themselves since they are being hunted down by white supremacists just for going to the store. I’m for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face.

      • WindInTrees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m for calling out assholes that tell minorities that they are the reason black kids get shot in the face.

        That’s a very disingenuous way of casting the argument. It has nothing to do with minorities, only with gun owners and supporters of gun ownership in general, regardless of race.

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No it’s not disingenuous. Bi_tux is a minority. Agitator told him that he’s the reason black kids get shot in the face. Bi_tux needs a gun in response to the hostility and violence of bigots. Ignoring bi_tux’s minority status and original statement because it’s inconvenient is kinda disingenuous though.

          Bi_tux (or any other minorities) having guns or not isn’t the cause of bigots shooting black kids in the face for ringing a doorbell.

          • WindInTrees@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, actually, it is. You either support gun rights and gun ownership or you don’t. If you do, you contribute to kids getting shot in the face. Minority status is irrelevant.

            • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh contribute is different than being the cause. Like I said from the beginning. So no. No disingenuousness. Just poor reading skills on your part.

              • WindInTrees@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol. My part. Right. Nice job arguing semantics after all your other bullshit. I’m done with this conversation.

                • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Semantics? It’s in my first comment. You were never trying to have a conversation. Being done is a good idea because if you actually did try to have a conversation your ideas probably wouldn’t hold up and I’m getting the impression that you lack the emotional maturity to handle that.