- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
yet another useless
featureannoyanceAndroid already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.
Which is a sensible choice security-wise.
Is it? Android already disables sideloading by default, requires each source to ask for permission, and prompts the user before each install. How does Samsung’s additional setting improve security?
it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung is introducing
Android already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.
…no, it doesn’t?
the article explains it
Explains what? This is not something that requires an explanation.
what you and I quoted comes from the article, and it’s true
No. Its not.
You can see the instructions to disable it in the screenshot of the thumbnail.
This article is pointless.
Came here to say exactly this. Dumb rage bait.
It is also only enabled by default on new phones and during OOBE setup there’s a toggle for this.
deleted by creator
I think that’s just the nature of smartphone related journalism at the moment. It’s sort of a reflection of where the industry is at: lacking substance and focused on short-termism above all else. In the media this translates to a never-ending hype circle around the latest releases, rumours and “leaks”. Everything else has some clickbait name and a bunch of poorly written, irrelevant filler to pad out the “article” for SEO purposes.
I mean this goes for “news” in general.
Some days are slower than others. If you’re not producing “news”, you’re not making money.
What do you do? Fabricate “news” whenever you can.
The question in the title is just a hook, but this is still an article, not a Q&A.
The text tells why the feature matters, tells it’s redundant, lists the phones affected by it, echoes some Samsung notes about the feature, and answers the question. It’s a report on a particular feature, I wouldn’t call it a filler.
- Return the Samsung phone
- Buy from a company that isn’t hostile towards its customers
Buy from a company that isn’t hostile towards its customers
LOL good luck with that one
Idk, Fairphone served me well
Unfortunately it’s not available around the globe
1.) Don’t buy a Samsung phone
My last Samsung phone was the Galaxy S1
Why so much hate on Samsung?
Besides what the other user said, they recently made it a requirement for accredited phone services that they destroy any samsung phones along with their data, that they receive for servicing, if they have found that the user has done “unauthorized servicing” on it.
This is the next step after making the phones practically impossible to be disassembled, which they have done years ago.Not gonna speak for anyone else but it’s all the bloatware and spyware for me.
What are some of the best alternatives? With comparable specs (in the US)?
Right now I have a Fold and honestly really like the foldables. Though I think the Pixel Fold is my only alternative there.
I think the Pixel Fold might be the best option for a foldable phone, because (just like all other Pixels) you can flash it with a private, secure, open-source ROM like GrapheneOS.
If you mean the S24, the equivalent from Sony would be the Xperia 5 V. Has audio jack and sd card compared to the S24, Sony batteries last 2 days even after several years of use thanks to excellent optimization and battery care, there’s almost zero bloat. On the downside it will only get 2 years of upgrades (until the end of 2025). Also you can’t unlock the bootloader on US models if that’s something you care about.
https://gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=12773&idPhone2=12534
Motorola makes the clamshell fold. Seems to be a lot better value as well. Can’t speak to all the bloatware and other anti-consumer shitfuckery because I’ve never seen a reviewer that thinks it’s important.
I believe you can purchase the OnePlus Open in the US. It’s listed on their US website and I have heard of people living in the US using it.
