I don’t think that contradicts what I said. I also don’t think it’s a particularly hot take, Hitler was very open about his conspiratorial ideas about the Jews, it’s a huge aspect of what motivated his desire to take them out in favor of his people, his master race. The ideas don’t contradict, they go together like peanut butter and jelly
That’s a weird way of pushing Nazi apologia. Not saying it’s intentional, I really don’t think you’re a Nazi, but by equating Hitler and Stalin you’re semantically trying to equate a paranoid leader who genuinely had anti-communist reactionaries after him amidst the people he killed with a person who orchestrated mass ethnic cleansing on racial grounds and no actual evidence, to a much higher degree per Capita than the former.
By doing so, this is essentially Nazi apologia and anti-Communist rhetoric, holding Communist states to a stricter standard than fascist ones.
It is not promoting Nazi apologia to suggest Hitler thought the Jews were in a conspiracy to take over the world. How could you possibly interpret that as apologia? Do you deny this is true? He literally did that, it’s an important piece of his history.
I also didn’t equate them. You’re confusing comparison to equalization. People can compare things, that’s allowed. Stop conflating the two things, I did not equate them, and it’s okay to make comparisons. Saying they were similar in one aspect does not suggest they were equivalent in all aspects. That’s just such a vastly different thing, and it’s a thing I didn’t do.
What standards do you think I’m holding communism to differently than fascists? How did your brain go from equating Hitler and Stalin, to holding completely different standards towards the states they ruled? I didn’t even mention Communism or Nazism or how they function in my comment, it was about Hitler and Stalin as individuals.
I don’t think that contradicts what I said. I also don’t think it’s a particularly hot take, Hitler was very open about his conspiratorial ideas about the Jews, it’s a huge aspect of what motivated his desire to take them out in favor of his people, his master race. The ideas don’t contradict, they go together like peanut butter and jelly
That’s a weird way of pushing Nazi apologia. Not saying it’s intentional, I really don’t think you’re a Nazi, but by equating Hitler and Stalin you’re semantically trying to equate a paranoid leader who genuinely had anti-communist reactionaries after him amidst the people he killed with a person who orchestrated mass ethnic cleansing on racial grounds and no actual evidence, to a much higher degree per Capita than the former.
By doing so, this is essentially Nazi apologia and anti-Communist rhetoric, holding Communist states to a stricter standard than fascist ones.
It is not promoting Nazi apologia to suggest Hitler thought the Jews were in a conspiracy to take over the world. How could you possibly interpret that as apologia? Do you deny this is true? He literally did that, it’s an important piece of his history.
I also didn’t equate them. You’re confusing comparison to equalization. People can compare things, that’s allowed. Stop conflating the two things, I did not equate them, and it’s okay to make comparisons. Saying they were similar in one aspect does not suggest they were equivalent in all aspects. That’s just such a vastly different thing, and it’s a thing I didn’t do.
What standards do you think I’m holding communism to differently than fascists? How did your brain go from equating Hitler and Stalin, to holding completely different standards towards the states they ruled? I didn’t even mention Communism or Nazism or how they function in my comment, it was about Hitler and Stalin as individuals.