Fact Check

Based on currently available numbers, there are about 31 vacant housing units for every homeless person in the U.S.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 months ago

      the vast majority of vacant homes are rentals looking for tenants, rather than rich peoples second homes.

      They’re the same picture.

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      So who owns these rental homes but is living elsewhere? Perhaps rich people looking to make cash on their second homes while they dont use them?

        • version_unsorted@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          There should be options other than renting and owning. If you don’t wish to own property there should still be housing available to you, but it doesn’t need to be rented from a landlord, it could be collectively owned (by tenants), municipal ownership, or something else. Relying on people with capital to provide housing while profiting from your need for housing is a broken system.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, why dont you start one and give away your labor to people that dont want to work as much as you?

            • jorp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you don’t want to participate in a market system why do you not simply die?

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because I dont want to die. If there were no market system how would you get food and survive?

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              True! What’s your point?

              Someone putting a basement suite in their home isn’t removing a purchasable dwelling from the market, it’s adding to the number of available dwellings.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh that is funny. Normal renters dont take care of a unit let alone a person that is homeless. And many problems are out of the ability of almost everyone. Is the homeless person going to replace the HVAC system?

    • littlecolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      “HR needs you to spot the difference between these two pictures.”

      Rentals looking for tenants

      Rich peoples second homes

      “They’re the same picture.”

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And behind Door Number 2, we have:

      “There’s not a joblessness crisis, there’s a labor shortage. We offered free pizza on fridays for this unpaid Senior Graphic Designer internship, and we’re still not getting applicants”

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are they homes in the places people want to live? Vacancies in Bumfuck, OK don’t help homeless people in Chicago.

      • jorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re just also saying the “free market” does a poor job of providing for the needs of the people. A socialist government would build homes where they’re needed

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure. The problem I’m seeing here is how people approach the solution. You can tax the hell out of vacancies everywhere, but it’s not going to help if there are no vacancies in specific cities.