• bjorney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was consuming about 150% of my normal pre-diet Calorie intake and losing 500g per day for a month. CICO is flatout not the mechanic used.

    You are stating that without knowing your calories out, and asserting that the laws of thermodynamics aren’t real

    Keto works due to two things: 1) proteins and fats are more filling than carbs, and 2) your basal metabolic rate increases when you are in ketosis

    • HeckGazer@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      People who say CICO doesn’t work are asserting that, at no point did I assert that. I simply stated that CICO isn’t the mechanism that keto uses.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is but it isn’t. CICO is not the whole picture, but it is the foundation of the rest of the picture.

        No matter what you eat, if you consume and absorb fewer calories than you burn you will lose weight, whether it be through body fat or body muscle.

        That is a known truth.

        However, there are many other factors at play right now that every single person that just jumps on the calorie in calorie out bandwagon refuse to wrap their heads around.

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I simply stated that CICO isn’t the mechanism that keto uses.

        It literally is though.

        When you are in ketosis your CO increases, so even if your CI stays the same you will now be operating at a deficit

        • HeckGazer@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          It is not.

          This is such an obnoxious form of pedantry. Yes you absorb less calories from the food you digest and yes you poop out more unused calories and yes the way your body uses fat is less chemically efficient than carbs.

          That’s just not what anyone means when they say CO. Technically true in such an “ummm aktshully I’m a teenager that just learned thermo 101 and have to be right about everything” kind of way that’s just not relevant to the discussion being had. Yes, of course if you put everyone doing keto in a chamber where you measured emitted heat and put all their poop through a calorimeter thermodynamics applies.

          The point is none of that matters in the context of discussing diets because you can very successfully lose weight on keto while eating more calories than you did before and not changing lifestyle.