The thing I look for most in a picture, is the models face. This lady has a stunning body, but no image in this set has a good shot of her face. This appears to be her first set, so I am looking forward to new sets, where her face can shine.
- 604 Posts
- 48 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 1st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Possible, the Polaroid was a fixed focus camera, which did have nice bokeh. That said, the widest (shallowest dept of field) setting on most Polaroids was f-11, which for close up work still gives a decent depth of field. (The smallest aperture was f-64).
I have seen photos (not this set) where the model was stating at about a 15 degree angle to the camera (straight on would be 0 degrees) and one nipple was in focus and the other was not.
I personally think, my opinion only, that it is a combination of two factors. The first being auto focus. The second being the lack, except on high end cameras of a split prism or micro prism view finder.
All of that said, it also depends on what you are looking at the image on. Most of the photos of this set, when looked at as thumbnails, or mid definition, look ok. It helps that the human eye/brain smooths things out. If you are looking at this set on a cell phone sized display I think it would be fine. I however am looking at the images on 31.5" displays.
I will also admit I am totally OCD about foreground portions of the photo (the model) being in focus.
A bit of a gripe with this set. There were a number of amazing poses in this set. However, half of the picture, in nearly all of them was out of focus. I don’t understand how today’s photographers do not understand depth of field (focus). Even more so that studios like Met Art would accept workmanship of such poor quality.
Thanks to @dugmeup for pointing this lady out.
Just in case anyone is trying to find her, her name is spelled Alysha A (with a y). A link to more information. TheNude
Oh, and she is stunning.
1·17 days agoI very much see one. Possibly your client (app) is not showing it. The image is immediately after the name of the set, and before the link to get more information.
Very pretty lady, unfortunately her skin shows indentations from her bra. Even worse in a few images from this set, you can see mosquitos on her. The set feels for a lack of time and bug spray. I can kind of guess why she only ever did this one set.
Not trying to be at all political here, but someone needs to figure what they are putting in the water in the Ukraine. Very pretty lady.
This is from ‘Ass and Pussy’ from Ultrafilms. Released Jun 15, 2020.
1·3 months agoThere are three ‘Paradis V.’ sets from Met Art for Danielle. These images are from the third set published.
I think this my be the first lady I have posted who has nipple piercings.
First, Thank you for posting!
Second, per the community requirements you must post a link to verify 18 USC 2257 compliance. For Tiffany this is
ShowyBeauty
Additionally I usually post a link so people can easily find more about a model if they wish. In this case
TheNudeAgain, love to see other people posting here.
Was a real tossup here which image to make the main, and which to put in the comments. I may have gotten it wrong…