Actually he did not. The whole “Jesus is the literal son of god” thing was invented by the churches some hundreds of years after Jeus was dead. In the same wake Jesus never spoke about the trinity, that god would have three aspects. That is also an invention of the churches to make christianity more palateable to polytheist pagans, in the same way that christmas was put next to the winter solstice and easter onto spring where it was mixed with pagan fertility deities, quite literally being named after the Germanic goddess of spring Eostre in Englisch or Ostera in German where easter is called Ostern.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_God_(Christianity)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter

It is very limited though. I would consider Germany more on the decriminalized side.

You are allowed to own a small amount. You are allowed to grow up to three plants at home. It is illegal to buy, sell, or import.

There is rules for having cannabis social clubs similiar to Spain, but the rules around them are quite complex and a lot of it remains unclear, until the law will have been interpreted in court decisions.

Some German states have already announced that they will make life hell for anyone smoking weed in legal public spaces or operating a legal cannabis social club. Also the level of permittable THC for driving is still undecided.

Currently any level of blood THC is considered a DUI and can not only get you a fine, but also a suspension of your drivers licencse with an extensive “medical psychological check up” if you want to regain your licencse. That “check up” is run by private businesses who also sell courses on which answers are right and which are wrong. Basically anything beyond “this was the only time i swear, i was in a bad place and i should have never done it and i am so sorry, and i will never do it again” is a wrong answer.

Now we had an expert proposal for a higher level of permittable blood THC. The proposed level has yet to pass but it would effectively be fine for occasional users, but still a problem for regular users, as it is close to the baseline THC level that they have.

So all in all it is a great step forward, especially considering how the “debate” from the political right and fascists was run around 1970s war on drug prohibition and cultural deprevation talking points. However it still creates many aspects to watch out for and it should be noted, that the political right wants to do everything to reverse the laws, when they likely win the elections next year. The problem with that is also that the center right social democrats are still internally devided, with many of them still thinking of weed as the devils lettuce.

Mate in 3 to get access to your late night yoghurt

Then help me understand please. What do you mean by “esoteric” in regards to oop in Python compared to a language better suited for it?

I disagree. Python is not “esoteric” when making objects. The syntax is certainly easier than in Java.

The industrialized meat industry in Europe has very little to do with farming. An industrial stable with tens of thousands of pigs who never see daylight or breath fresh air is a factory, where bought animal feed is input, and manure and pigs are output.

Unless you are forced to life in that area you are making a choice. And you are not forced to life there. It comes with trade offs. The trade offs are traded in the housing market. People fled the cities in the 80s to move into suburbs. Now people want to life in the city again.

And cost of living of course includes the coffee and toast. You see that in areas that are gentrified, forcing people who dont make the 100k a year to move away. Where before the coffee was 3$ it now is 15$. And someone is paying for that, otherwise the business would not work. So again people are making that choice. And the people with 100k make the choice actually forcing the hand of people who only make 30k and are literally forced out of their neighbourhood.

Of course then there is all the more compulsion to claim, that they had no choice but to gentrify and had no choice but to drive people out of their neighbourhoods. Because if the people with 100k weren’t forced to do so, then they would need to take responsibility for their role in that market. Of course the main responsibility remains with the landlords who are happy to drive rents up and people out. But then again i doubt there to be many six figure engineers who are devout to left parties (in case of the US, the Democrats are not a left party by any outside standard.)

But then why is it an acceptable choice for the commuting grocery store worker, but not for the engineer? There is a quality of living involved here that the engineer chooses to pay for, which the grocery store worker doesn’t have.

Thats what i mean with unrealised luxuries. They claim to live paycheck to paycheck because their understanding of what a “normal” standard of living ist, is very different, from what “normal” people actually have as a standard of living.

This is not to say, that theses conditions are a good society or dont need changing. But who can get such an engineering job definetely chooses to have a quality of life that he pays all his paycheck for. If it wouldn’t be a choice the grocery store workers wouldn’t exist.

So where is that place, where the cost of living fully eat up a 250k salary, or even a 100k salary? And by eating up i mean actually living paycheck to paycheck, not as given in the examples enjoying many small luxuries that add up, but are not realised as such.

I get the concept. But realistically that would mean three things:

In a region where people make 250k a year for them to live paycheck to paycheck the cost of living would need to be somewhere around 4-5x higher than in an area where people would make 50k a year.

That would further mean that in the areas where people make 250k a year noone would exist that could afford anything less than that. So the grocery store cashier and the gas station clerk and the postman would all need to make the same money as google software engineers. That is clearly not the case.

And thirdly that means that either the people who make that much money living paycheck to paycheck are economically illiterate and dont grasp such simple concepts… Or which is far more likely, the quality of life in high cost of living areas is in fact so much better, that it is worth paying the extra.

Either way someone who can make 250k a year is choosing to life paycheck to paycheck by choosing to pay such expenses. They definetely have the means to work somewhere where the difference between cost of living and paycheck allows for saving signficant amounts of money over time. Claiming those people would be victims of the system who were forced to live paycheck to paycheck is simply not true. It is still very much their own choice.

Excuse me what? Someone earning that much money is only living paycheck to paycheck because their lifestyle is that expensive. And then it actually is their own fault for buying the 15$ Latte with a 30$ Avocado toast every morning, driving to work in their leased 100k $ car, while their wive drives her own 100k $ car.

Außerdem, auch wenn ich nicht weiß, wie es bei dir aussieht, aber für mich ist es selbstverständlich und muss nicht explizit erwähnt werden, dass die Demokratie auch zuhause bewahrt und gefördert werden muss.

Wäre schön, wenn das für die Bundestagsparteien und Indistrievetreter auch selbstverständlich wäre. Wenn man sich so die Forderungen der letzten Monate und Jahre anschaut, ist es das leider nicht.

You develop your own database application or use a professional file system with customizeable attributes.

Then you end up cursing yourself because half the time you didn’t fill in any of the entries that would actually help you find it again and you named it “funny comic cheetos”

Kommt auf die Zielsetzung an. Wenn das Ziel ist Demokratie zu fördern, ist es ein Argument.

Wenn es nur darum geht Partikularinteressen zu verteidigen, ob nun von europäischen oder chinesischen Eliten, dann ist es ein Strohmann. Im zweiten Fall ist es genauso ein Strohmann darauf abzuzielen das China eine Autokratie ist. Das ist bei wirtschaftlichen Fragen in Deutschland einfach egal, ob man mit einer Autokratie oder einer Demokratie Handel treibt.

Und konkret auf China bezogen hatte Deutschland ja die letzten zwanzig Jahre so gar kein Problem Geschäfte mit und in China zu machen. Jetzt wo China eine wirtschaftliche Bedrohung geworden ist, soll es plötzlich relevant sein?

Ich finde das Argument berechtigt. Es bringt nichts, die Autokratie in China zu bekämpfen, wenn man nicht gleichzeitig die Demokratie zu Hause verteidigt.

Das es dabei letztlich nicht um Systeme und mehr Demokratie und Menschenrechte, sondern lediglich um strategische Überlegungen geht, sieht man aber daran wie andere Regimes, z.B. Saudi Arabien und Azerbaidschan in Deutschland hofiert werden. Ironischerweise wären chinesische Solarmodule und Elektroautos ein Weg, um von saudischen Öl wegzukommen.

Ich finde China genauso scheiße wie jede andere Autokratie, aber wir sollten uns nicht von Systemkampfpropaganda blenden lassen, wenn es um wirtschaftliche Klientelinteressen geht.

Aber wir mussten Kurzarbeitergeld geben während Rekordgewinne als Dividenden ausgeschüttet wurden! Sonst hätte China einfach ganz BMW aufgekauft weil die Aktien eingebrochen wären!

Guckt euch an, was in Dänemark passiert ist, wo Coronahilfen an Dividendensperren gebungen wurden. Das ganze Land gehört jetzt ausländischen Investoren und die Menschen leben alle in Knechtschaft 111!!!ölfdrölf sabber

Next up:

Bathing senior heinously drowned in attack by stormy sea.
Men brutally murdered by evil train, when innocently walking on tracks.
More than 1.000 people killed every year by being smashed after floors violently accelerated at them. When will the EU finally outlaw them?

The students at Tianmenn protested for China becoming democratic and gainst China becoming capitalist. So it is quite strongly linked to Western commercial and colonial interests.

China developed just as the West wanted, by adopting capitalist economics without democratic systems or worse democratic ownership of the means of production.

Just that China then outplayed the West at their own game.

Den Aspekt als Nichtraucher mit Tabak in Kontakt zu kommen verstehe ich voll.

Wenn man ohne Filter raucht, ist allerdings auch pures Gras ungesünder als eine Zigarette. Seit Jahrtausenden werden mWn. keine Tüten gerollt, sondern dann wurde Pfeife geraucht. Eine pure Pfeife muss man aber ständig wieder anzünden. Wenn man die Möglichkeit hat, dann ist ein Verdamper in jedem Fall die beste Wahl, um die gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigung beim Inhalieren zu minimieren. Am wenigsten schädlich wird oraler Konsum sein. Der ist nur schlecht steuerbar.

Nein das ist nicht normal. Wenn es so wie beschrieben stattgefunden hat, ist es einem Gericht auch völlig unwürdig.

Die beschriebenen Anschuldigungen der Anwälte haben herzlich wenig mit dem Verfahren zu tun, und verschwenden die Zeit aller Beteiligten. Allein deswegen wäre es schon im Interesse des Gerichts, einzuschreiten und sich auf das eigentliche Thema Tathergang zu beschränken.