Sounds like pygit2 is the move until dulwich has a bit more support.

Not technically about it, dude was a human and became a cyborg. 100% not AI

shadow stats

Bruh.

Whole lotta sith out there in the Internet. Oh well this has been fun, have a good one

You’re making an assumption that it’s an exaggeration. I actually touched on this earlier but we’re on the Internet and unless someone goes to lengths to make it clear they are exaggerating or being sarcastic or whatever, that kind of stuff does not convey.

Example, I fucking hate all ice cream.

Am I exaggerating or do I actually hate all ice cream?

Hello, am on the left. Can confirm it’s a reasonable policy thatakes him a pretty reasonable candidate to me.

without any advantage over them

This is a direct quote. Taken at face value, this sentence is saying “everything cars can do, SUVs can also do but SUVs are limited to exactly those capabilities and nothing else.” If we take a logical step, it’s reasonable to go from the quote and it’s breakdown to “SUVs have no real use” because they merely duplicate the capabilities of a car and having a redundant yet unique style of vehicle with no advantages of it’s own makes it pretty not useful.

This is the longer quote

SUVs also use more resources to run and be produced then small cars, without any advantage over them.

How are you getting from

without any advantage over them

to

assertion isn’t that no SUV is useful

? Cause I see nothing that directly supports that claim and implication + the internet is a pretty bad combo given the general lack of subtlety of blank text on a screen.

Edit:

You are attempting to refute data with an anecdote

I reread this, yes I’m using personal experience to refute a point. I won’t deny that, but neither will I deny the validity of this statement. "I was hauling gear that was simply too much for a sedan to handle. I own and haul a Pelican 1660 which is measured at 31.59 x 22.99 x 19.48 in (80.2 x 58.4 x 49.5 cm). That thing wasn’t fitting in a honda civic’s backdoor, let alone safely into the backseat. Then add a folding table 2 plastic tote boxes and my stagelighting bag? No way.

He might have a hard time implementing that given he just got a guilty verdict.

Nice alright, yeah with mine, the seats will fold and you have these moving platforms that you can raise to match the seat back level but you can’t put much if any weight on the platform. It’s a cool idea but wasn’t particularly well designed.

Yeah that looks like a really killer feature. would significantly help with the pelican case and (future) roadcases. I have a similar feature in my nissan rogue, but the “stowing” of the seats feels a little hinky.

Downvoting and ghosting someone who is giving valid information based on being the first to arrive and the very last to leave for dozens of shows often times getting home around 6am or 10am in the morning the next day is pretty dickish.

I’m not forcing anyone to like what I’m saying, I simply ask that the experiences being acknowledged for what they are which only one or two people seem to be doing.

I don’t disagree with you there, but my intention wasn’t to compare SUVs/CUVs to other cargo carrying vehicles so much as to point out that sedans and coupes are not nearly as well suited to hauling gear/equipment/boxes.

I am curious which minivan you have, I’m considering getting back into my moonlighting gig and having options for a more fuel efficient vehicle would be good to keep in mind.

I personally want to see humans invest in geoengineering but not for climate change. I believe geoengineering research and development will lead to terraforming which we’ll need to expand beyond the earth.

SUVs also use more resources to run and be produced *than small cars, without any advantage over them.

Says someone who has never needed to haul cargo to and some a venue before.

Other than hauling an actual SUV full of cargo, I agree it’s mostly a waste.

Edit: lol, down votes and ghosting even though an advantage was given. Good job Lemmy, you’re acting just like the redditors.

Bamboo straws are pretty decent in my experience

Out of all of the ways you could have responded, instead of fostering conversation and helping to educate someone, this is what you choose.

Oh well, makes me grateful for the other commentor since I can have a really good and enjoyable conversation with them. Bye Felicia.

Appreciate the info!

The big unknown is how powerful quantum computers will get. It’s going to take a lot of qubits to break public key crypto. It may be completely unfeasible to juggle that many qubits in superposition. It’s also possible it will only barely do it, in which case we can also increase the key size and call it a day. But post-quantum crypto is being worked on, just in case.

That’s absolutely the point I’m driving to. We basically have the eniacs of quantum sure we have an idea of what they can do now but 5-10 years down the road are solid mystery. In the spirit of that, to me, ‘post quantum’ is kinda of meaningless vaporware when we only just started with quantum computing. Maybe I’m being a dick about it but that’s my mindset for better or worse.

Zoom is still bullshit. Their software has had all sorts of problems that don’t need QC to exploit.

Agreed, fuck zoom.

I’m being sarcastic. It’s marketing bs.

The actual info is that the encryption is supposed to be quantum resistant which I doubt given quantum machines aren’t widely available to public so we don’t fully know their capabilities.

What does post quantum even meaaan

West Taiwan friend. Lesser sounds odd when it’s more populated and geographically larger. Though inferior sounds fitting