I get were you’re coming from, but on the other hand most women put no effort to their profiles whatsoever. In my experience with Tinder 90-95% of profiles don’t even have a bio, so how am I supposed to filter people based on some pictures and three tagged hobbies (which are usually bland like movies, travel, nights out)?

Are you implying that you don’t remember that experience, or that salvia caused you memory issues?

Going by the same logic Iran is also a winner because they got a live test for their drones and missiles

It can if you don’t do a train-test split.

But even if you consider the training set only, having zero loss is definitely a bad sign.

why is SWAT being called for stolen phones??

That implication wasn’t made. The original comment mentions how it took men 70 years to drain it (meaning that the drainage started during the USSR), and the comment below does not challenge that fact.

This does not dispute his claim that most of the evaporation happened post-USSR.

grep file ...

name that now we’re forced to use because of some plutocrat.

no one is forcing you to call it X instead of Twitter

Impressive mental gymnastics. So the “starving” Cubans live more than Americans because Americans have “too much” bread?

"It’s not a war crime but if it is they deserve it’

There really isn’t a complicated discussion to be had unless you needlessly complicate things. There’s a big difference between having, say, better monitor or headphones in terms of resolution or sound quality vs having a monitor or headphones that add extra features.

It’s like saying that AR glasses that visualize a ball’s trajectory should be allowed in tennis or football because players can already invest in better rackets or shoes.

The detection problem is not unsolvable. First, you can forbid people that are using that monitor from matchmaking. You can find your monitor’s model number using software so that would be trivial. For a more nuanced approach, you can examine players’ reaction times and ban people that got too good too fast.

wtf Malta

just like in yu-gi-oh

We have to change our voting system

You think that one of the two major parties will help you do away with the voting system that favors the major parties? This is not how it works. Having a few people that support change in the party is meaningless as long as it is not a stated objective (which it isn’t)

Maybe the democrats should pull their heads up from their asses and realize that “vote for us or else” doesn’t have the rallying power they think it does, especially when they’re repeating it every election cycle.

Just some thoughts from someone outside the US.

ah yes, the famous “autocracy of the proletariat”

social democracy =/= socialism

“It’s complicated because although the Jews were a minority in Palestine after WW2, we can’t ignore the many Jews living there now”. Paraphrasing from something I heard on TV.

not on my machine! every time someone posts a screenshot with a handwritten font it’s less readable and looks bad