• 1 Post
  • 59 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle



  • (6.9-4.2)/(2024-2018) = 0.45 “version increments” per year.

    4.2/(2018-1991) = 0.15 “version increments” per year.

    So, the pace of version increases in the past 6 years has been around triple the average from the previous 27 years, since Linux’ first release.

    I guess I can see why 6.9 would seem pretty dramatic for long-time Linux users.

    I wonder whether development has actually accelerated, or if this is just a change in the approach to the release/versioning process.


  • The DJI Fly app is probably considerably worse for security/privacy than most Google apps. DJI has a storied history of sketchy practices in their apps: see here.

    Google also won’t allow DJI to distribute their apps through the Play Store, because of DJI’s weird insistence on being able to push arbitrary binaries to customers’ phones entirely free of any third party vetting.

    GrapheneOS’ sandbox hardening might help somewhat, but I’d recommend avoiding DJI products if you can. If you must use DJI Fly, prefer to use it in a different profile where it can’t touch any of your personal apps. Tough when they are singularly the best drone manufacturer for videography though.




  • You can restrict what gets installed by running your own repos and locking the machines to only use those (either give employees accounts with no sudo access, or have monitoring that alerts when repo configs are changed).

    So once you are in that zone you do need some fast acting reactive tools that keep watch for viruses.

    For anti-malware, I don’t think there are very many agents available to the public that work well on Linux, but they do exist inside big companies that use Linux for their employee environments. For forensics and incident response there is GRR, which has Linux support.

    Canonical may have some offering in this space, but I’m not familiar with their products.




  • rho50@lemmy.nztoTechnology@beehaw.orgBut Claude said tumor!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad thing that an AI got it wrong.

    I think the bigger issue is why the AI model got it wrong. It got the diagnosis wrong because it is a language model and is fundamentally not fit for use as a diagnostic tool. Not even a screening/aid tool for physicians.

    There are AI tools designed for medical diagnoses, and those are indeed a major value-add for patients and physicians.






  • I saw a job posting for Senior Software Engineer position at a large tech company (not Big Tech, but high profile and widely known) which required candidates to have “an excellent academic track record, including in high school.” A lot of these requirements feel deliberately arbitrary, and like an effort to thin the herd rather than filter for good candidates.