in terms of geopolitics, it is.
in terms of geopolitics, it is.
how does russia benefit from deliberately using inferior equipment and not going all out? they don’t want a long, protracted conflict.
why did the ussr invade finland?
because racism.
i never did support russia’s government. now i have even less reason to.
bulletproof blankets seem marginally more useful than transparent backpacks…
china was never going to save europe and the west. did you expect them to?
votes are public?
only fools and racists believe that china can’t innovate.
why is a far right party being supportive of russia?
the cities are indeed nice but should not be taken as being representative of the country as a whole. people living outside cities matter, too, and rural areas are not yet as developed.
telling! i just hope that china can phase out coal entirely.
with a physical invasion? russia still has nukes.
torn apart? how so?
there’s no need to defend wasteful effort. these aren’t even porn games or anything like that. the cpc has more important things to focus on than what’s in video games.
not so. they’re pro-anything that impedes russia, which includes infighting. if the us had another civil war, many of us would certainly support it.
fortunately, the nypd lacks equipment such as tanks, missiles, and artillery. spending isn’t everything; what they spend it on is everything.
censorship of even mildly revealing outfits in games isn’t a good use of time and effort. the cpc is too prudish a lot of the time.
rationalwiki is pretty good…if not for its liberal bias.
i’m surprised that it admits this.