If the Republicans have been in power more than Democrats, why haven’t they investigated all the Democrats and sued them? Are you saying that the Republicans are incompetent? Tell me this also, which party holds the majority in Supreme Court right now?

This would be a sick white ink tattoo.

generally have to see to their own needs before being able to do the administrative work on men’s behalf.

Same logic applies to men as well. And I don’t like your perspective of said groups always being enemies of each other. If this perspective was uniformly adopted, queers will never have their rights because they are a minority. While the majority groups only fighting for theirs. IMHO we need to look at all these as human rights and human values. Not gay rights, trans rights, women’s rights or men’s rights. Otherwise we don’t get anywhere.

Are you on Jerboa by any chance?

For clarification I am against Jordan Peterson and the ilk but equal opportunity y’all.

No you don’t.

Don’t forget French.

Fedora KDE. Rock solid stable and my daily driver.

Nobody wants to watch a video to participate in a text-based debate

Why not? What’s wrong with using the most presentable, easy to digest content? If I needed to present a graph to support my claim would you rather have me describe that information in text rather than link to a picture or a video that shows that graph?

Also, there’s no need to watch the videos in length either to get what I’m presenting either. They describe and support proof to my 2 claims,

1. Investigator should be independent
2. There should be no conflict of interest in where money is coming from to pay the investigator

I presented 3 videos in a few comments but didn’t want to spam it to every reply. But here they are for your convenience.

1. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qwbq9OsHvp4
2. https://youtu.be/CTxt96DwaFk?si=0KHoVdFElOoH0-Za
3. https://youtu.be/C_0XEIFGK5o?si=Yc_hONVBDGcEV_t6

If you were thinking that we were having a debate, why don’t you stick to debate rules and present a rebuttal to my claims?

I’d like to receive criticism to what I presented instead of you resorting to ad-hominem, please.

Exactly! Such obvious, sensible, common sense things most people don’t realise these days smh.

Firms don’t hire auditors/investigators to give them a rosy report.

That’s exactly why firms do it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwbq9OsHvp4

But a third party audit lying to a firm to make them look good does not provide value.

Why not? Making them look good IS providing value according to the client that pays tha audit firm.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTxt96DwaFk

If the absolute auditing giant EY doesn’t say anything bad on behalf of their clients, this firm doing it is certainly within realms of possibility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_0XEIFGK5o

They hired an outside firm to audit them. That’s industry best practice

That practice has lost its credibility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwbq9OsHvp4

Invite a third party to do it. The funds could have come from crowd-sourcing.

You forgot,

0. Be white

You said ten, the joke didn’t.

/r/swoosh

PS: Is there an equivalent in Lemmy for this yet?

Victim blaming if I ever saw one.

Sounds like a pos.

Also that sounds very illegal, no complaints have been filed or anything?

Do what happened if you bring a book to class already signed?