paradox@lemmynsfw.comtoLemmy NSFW@lemmynsfw.com•Should we remove canonical age rule? RESULT: not removed.English
5·
1 year agoIt’s clear that this is a difficult issue. I think a lot of the controversy here is coming form the wording of the rules.
I think these rules set better standards while being much clearer and simpler to act upon:
- No sexual depictions of people (real or fictional) under the age of 18. Period.
- All sexual depictions of fictional characters must unambiguously appear as 18+.
- Ambiguous depictions include but are not limited to:
- “3,000 year old frozen in perpetual youth” type fictional characters
- “Aged up, but not really” depictions of fictional characters who are below the age of 18 in their source material
- The basis for ambiguous content will be behavior and physical appearance. Admin/mod’s decision is final.
These rules make it very clear that depictions of people, real or fictional, below the age of 18 is explicitly banned. They also give admins/mods a little more discretion on ambiguous content. Eg, “aged up” fictional characters that are very clearly depicted as adults (eg, 65 year old Lisa Simpson) can be allowed with these rules.
Content that most people consider extreme needs to be opt-in for viewers. Eg I don’t want to see content like this in the new/active feeds. Of course users can block it, but I don’t think that’s enough. Think if a new user joins and sees the new feed filled with content they are uncomfortable with.
Lemmy really needs a way to filter sensitive communities so content like this can be hidden away from feeds/federation unless users explicitly want to see it.