• 0 Posts
  • 2 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • paradox@lemmynsfw.comtoLemmy NSFW@lemmynsfw.comShould we ban scat fetish?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Content that most people consider extreme needs to be opt-in for viewers. Eg I don’t want to see content like this in the new/active feeds. Of course users can block it, but I don’t think that’s enough. Think if a new user joins and sees the new feed filled with content they are uncomfortable with.

    Lemmy really needs a way to filter sensitive communities so content like this can be hidden away from feeds/federation unless users explicitly want to see it.


  • It’s clear that this is a difficult issue. I think a lot of the controversy here is coming form the wording of the rules.

    I think these rules set better standards while being much clearer and simpler to act upon:

    1. No sexual depictions of people (real or fictional) under the age of 18. Period.
    2. All sexual depictions of fictional characters must unambiguously appear as 18+.
    • Ambiguous depictions include but are not limited to:
      • “3,000 year old frozen in perpetual youth” type fictional characters
      • “Aged up, but not really” depictions of fictional characters who are below the age of 18 in their source material
    • The basis for ambiguous content will be behavior and physical appearance. Admin/mod’s decision is final.

    These rules make it very clear that depictions of people, real or fictional, below the age of 18 is explicitly banned. They also give admins/mods a little more discretion on ambiguous content. Eg, “aged up” fictional characters that are very clearly depicted as adults (eg, 65 year old Lisa Simpson) can be allowed with these rules.