Because judges usually need the support of the prosecutor and police to get re-elected. So the warrant will be issued, otherwise the judge is “soft on crime”. It’s never “the judge is strong on Constitutional rights.”
Because judges usually need the support of the prosecutor and police to get re-elected. So the warrant will be issued, otherwise the judge is “soft on crime”. It’s never “the judge is strong on Constitutional rights.”
Jerry Seinfeld has never been politically relevant and hasn’t suffered in the least because of his Seinfeld residuals.
Bill Hicks (RIP) has never been more relevant.
Asking the real question.
The lack of capitalization unexpectedly triggered me.
I’d love to see it, but he’s not going to lose.
That’s a question for the jury. Charge the manager with all and let the jury decide.
691948 here.
691948
I think you might be over estimating the number of sane drivers.
Thanks. I’ll look into it.
Oh, nice. Thanks!
Thanks. I’ll look into it.
That’s fair.
And most people aren’t here.
I don’t understand what’s going on. Can someone ELI5?
This is a great idea. It’d be better if BookWyrm could find a way to import our data from Goodreads. But that depends heavily on the ability to get data out of Goodreads. And it’d be nice if BookWyrm had a mobile client. A lot of wishes here.
This is an insightful softball. Of course, inside fastballs aren’t really appropriate at this point of the process. Upvoted, mofo.
Maybe I’m wrong, but I read this as a woman’s response to Republicans.