Because for some piracy isn’t simply about being a cheapskate but also about activism
Because for some piracy isn’t simply about being a cheapskate but also about activism
If people want to crawl back into Meta’s clutches I’m not going to stop them. Don’t give the one nice thing we have to a corporation that only wants to exploit us.
This is not exactly true.
It’s not that the votes don’t count, it’s that Reddit uses a particular technique where the karma you see is randomly modified every time to make it impossible to see if your vote has an effect.
The goal is to prevent bots from realizing when they have been shadow banned. It makes it easier to control automated vote manipulation since bots will just make a new account if they realize they’re banned.
We need Accidental Renaissance here
They don’t want to deal with the legal implications of it. Spez has said ad nauseum that they don’t want to risk 3PA providing NSFW content to users that Reddit is not allowed to serve because they don’t want to be held responsible for that. Especially now that some US states are requiring actual ID verification for 18+ content.
While Spez is a lying weasel, I don’t doubt that Reddit is worried about NSFW-related lawsuits, bad press, and ad revenue impact.
And, the next step after having control of the content is to further restrict it.
Political compasses are stupid anyway.
It’s a political torus. Walk of one end and you end up in the other
Let’s assume that everyone who upvoted their option also downvoted the alternative.
The group A, has |A| number of individuals. Group B has |B| number.
Option A: |A| - |B|
Option B: |B| - |A|
Option A = |A| - |B|
= -(-(|A| - |B|))
= -(|B| - |A|)
= -Option B
The results would be opposites of each other and would highlight the opinion of the majority anyway.
I don’t disagree with your stance. I just want to point out that the fallacy exists. It’s called the “Fallacy fallacy” or “Argument from fallacy”
Those were friendly exclamation marks. Not angry ones.
Disregarding an argument because it contains a fallacy is a fallacy too.
We’ve seen this happen on Reddit and I’ve seen it happen in multiple subs. The comment might have been alarmist but given past examples it’s not unfounded.
They have done so already for a few subs where a few of the mods were willing to budge. In others, all mods were removed and the subs were made restricted.