deleted by creator
Might be misunderstanding this myself, but I thought a transparent proxy intercepts the requests to the destination.
Now if this is the case, I wouldn’t expect any changes to your nix config, as it should be transparently intercepting the requests to cache.nixos.org. Now how this would work with nginx in this context I haven’t quite gotten my head around.
Unless your set your gateway to be your nginx box; to handle all requests and forward them on as necessary.
Might give this a go on my build server if I get a chance.
Leny Yoro confirmed, I never believed they would be able to pull that one off, hats off to inios at least so far they look more than competent.
Also terms agreed with Ugarte, will this depend on PSG getting Neves done first, maybe but with the speed we’re going as this is better done very soon as well.
I do have a function that I cribbed from somewhere, unfortunately I didn’t note down the source at the time so can’t give them due credit here.
filterNixFiles = k: v: v == "regular" && lib.hasSuffix ".nix" k;
importNixFiles = path: (lib.lists.forEach (lib.mapAttrsToList (name: _: path + ("/" + name)) (lib.filterAttrs filterNixFiles (builtins.readDir path)))) import;
Then used as normal
modules = [ home-manager.nixosModules.home-manager vscode-server.nixosModule ] ++ (importNixFiles ./hosts/required) ++ (importNixFiles ./hosts/machines/${hostname})
Edit
Apologies for formatting on mobile
That’s the weird thing I’ve run up the image and the directory isn’t there. I did try a similar command in my ci.yml but it didn’t work.
Nope but I’ve loaded up the image it’s running and the directory isn’t there.
Perfect food reference for Migleemo. Don’t know if it was 100% intentional but perfect none the less.
Still playing too slowly, but at least we’re not 2-0 down already.
Obligation makes more sense, from the selling point of view if it was an option, we could just not take it up and then take him anyway on a free. Unless I’ve missed something.
Either way, I’m happy we’ve got him, but this transfer window had been terribly planned and we really could’ve done with getting this done before we even went on your.
Obligatory Glazers out.
Would prefer the Cucurella, but if it’s Reguilon + Amrabat (with option to buy) then it’s better than nothing, but still been a poor window overall.
Yeah, I’m still hopeful, they can use the Kovar money for that.
Fingers crossed that means Amrabat incoming.
Also liking the sell on clauses they are adding to deals makes a lot of sense and is nice little bonus down the line.
Interesting might have to give this a go in a dual boot.
Not sure how this game is still 0-0, but let’s hope for a few goals our way in the second half.
Well it’s a better start than last season, was expecting more. Really don’t like Rashford up top, just doesn’t suit him, hopefully Rasmus will be available soon, as I think until we get him in the team, it’s not going to be to dissimilar to last season.
Disappointed in hearing this as really rated him, but hearing there is a buy back clause I actually think this is a really good move to a excellent club where he can get some really good experience. Then potentially we can get him back on the cheap if needed.
Good luck, always liked Fred, although his inconsistency was frustrating, always loved watching him when he was told to man mark a player out of the game.
Good news, never been the biggest fan of Maguire but I think West Ham will suit him and hopefully he can get some confidence back before the Euros as Southgate will more than likely continue to select him.
I think I saw something in the mirror saying we’ve reignited our interest, but personally don’t believe it. I think they are using Utds name to get a bigger few elsewhere.
But in the case of it being true, I’m not sure I like it, we desperately need cover for Case and Amrabat would be perfect whilst also be able to play in a number of other roles.
I’d rather we look at getting a second striker over a 3rd midfielder this window (assuming we sign Amrabat)
I think you would need something like this
services.libinput.touchpad.additionalOptions = ‘’ Option “ScrollPixelDistance” “YOUR_SPEED” ‘’
https://man.archlinux.org/man/libinput.4#SCROLL_PIXEL_DISTANCE
I think this should work with touchpad as well but I havent tried it personally.