![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/92e2002c-34f6-4b47-8d29-c35001ffe9e1.webp)
There’s actually an investigation? That had slipped my notice/memory.
There’s actually an investigation? That had slipped my notice/memory.
You think prosecutors need to be paid off to hide evidence and generally ignore the rights of defendants?
You’re watching it wrong.
What on earth are you talking about?
The “clickbait” title seems the more accurate of the two, having read the article.
Harmy’s versions aren’t anywhere near as good as TN1’s (which have existed for years, none of this is news).
Spent the entire last clip waiting for a finish where Becky hits the floor but it doesn’t matter because she went through the ropes…but apparently we were just supposed to forget that?
It says “undisputed” on the graphic?
Didn’t they just unveil different new tag belts the other day?
You said “Internet darling”, not “indy darling”.
any internet darling is going to end up in AEW by that fact alone.
This is the logic that had Owens and Zayn as AEW locks a year ago.
Making double your budget is basically breaking even, once you account for marketing costs and the cinema’s cut of the take.
Video evidence is far more convincing than someone’s say-so.
Streaming doesn’t pay out per view, they just pay a lump sum up front to licence. If you’re not already a hit, that lump sum will be low, and if millions of people stream the film it makes the studio exactly zero dollars.
No it isn’t.
When I first saw the trailer on TV, I assumed it was a cat food ad spoofing movie trailers.
My understanding was that “millennial” was first coined to refer to those graduating in 2000.
None of the planes shown in the film ever left the ground.
This is why I don’t understand the “big action movies need a cinema, small comedies you can watch at home” argument. My home theatre can replicate the big-screen action experience just fine, but a comedy with a crowd is immediately 35% funnier.