![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
I’ve come to stalk with you again
Yes… Sniff
Suppositories sounds like the best option here.
I like this style. What was the prompt?
I agree but I think the problem is that some apps/sites have strict password requirements, which usually includes adding upper-case, symbols, numbers, and then limits the length even sometimes…
Yep. Fix what you can control, and accept what you cannot. You cannot control what others do, you can only try to persuade. What you can control is your reaction to it.
OP, you may want to try reading some books on stoicism.
The graphic audiobooks are pretty great already. Would love some visuals to go with it. Would need a big budget though…
There’s always money in the alaska-stand, ;) ;)
Dopedopedope. No doubtnodoubtnodoubt
You’ve come to ring the bells again.
The largest solar grazing project in the U.S. will reduce mowing costs and emissions — and make for some happy sheep.
What about if there’s a fire, can I use the hose to put it out?
Max now owns the library, and would like to make some changes.
JD Vance tucks his shirt into his underwear, pass it on
*diesk
JD Vance uses bleach on colored fabrics pass it on
Banks do have strict risk requirements (i.e. Basel III), in terms of what they are allowed to do with money, and are stress-tested on a regular basis. However, the type of scenario OP is posing would mean every bank would need to write-off their loans, and hope they have capital invested in other places to keep them afloat.
Since banks have these capital at risk requirements, the government feels comfortable to guarantee accounts up to a certain amount, as every bank going down at the same time is generally speaking a very unlikely event. So usually they would cover the account, take over the bank (if needed), put it into administration, and wind-down positions to claw back money to cover the insurance claims.