It’s really frustrating when these bullshitters legislate based solely on some internal feelings they have, then turn around and use all kinds of rhetorical tricks to deny mountains of evidence in a way that creates a facade of objectivity. Only their opponent is disallowed from relying on their subjective experience to support their position. But also their opponent is barred from using objective evidence because the sources are always deemed biased.
They don’t care at all about what is right or true. They’re not concerned with the wellbeing of anyone outside their own immediate family at best. They want power and control by any means necessary, so they don’t have to be consistent, only convincing.
It’s really frustrating when these bullshitters legislate based solely on some internal feelings they have, then turn around and use all kinds of rhetorical tricks to deny mountains of evidence in a way that creates a facade of objectivity. Only their opponent is disallowed from relying on their subjective experience to support their position. But also their opponent is barred from using objective evidence because the sources are always deemed biased.
They don’t care at all about what is right or true. They’re not concerned with the wellbeing of anyone outside their own immediate family at best. They want power and control by any means necessary, so they don’t have to be consistent, only convincing.