Except then the ordinary workers who did nothing wrong are made to suffer. Either they don’t get paid or they lose their jobs. IMHO you make the CEO personally liable. They have the power to change the company attitude and policy. They need to have their personal fortune hit as well as jail time.
Even then you can still have someone read the source and write a spec for a second programmer to write a library. The programmer never saw the source code but it was still useful. Still legal to do this. If someone dumped original source into the projector could be similarly checked for duplication without breaking the law.
It’s Val Kilmer’s superhero name. His super villain name is “Kill more”.
To me, modern says more about the techniques and methods used. In that respect, not much has changed even though 25 years has passed. Even stylistically it is more similar to a current film than one filmed 25 years before its release, i.e. mid 1970s. As someone else said, contemporary is a better word for describing its age than modern.
They need to shoulder bump too, otherwise they could just be former colleagues or perhaps two men who met for the first time yesterday.
Not really, the conservatives steam rollered the lib dems. Ultimately it was just a conservative agenda enabled by the lib dems.
On the religion side the last picture should be the same as the first.
From the article, looks like this thing can time travel too.
“This is a vital step towards our ambition to remove all diesel and new trains from the UK rail network by 2014."
I really hope they can get rid of all those new trains too . Rail travel just isn’t the same without the dank smells
The article covered that. This is designed to be cheaper apparently…
Your point is what? That 100% of the people voted for them? Or that those who opposed them should silently fall in line?
Sorry, they absolutely should protest and they absolutely are entitled to.
Am elected government shouldn’t have carte blanch to make changes designed to rig the system in their favour.
Maybe too subtle, but the point of my comment was the asterisk at the end.
Whether it is a bad translation or not, it is what most people understand to be what the Bible teaches. Life is sacred and should not be taken. My asterisk was there to convey that everyone had their own terms and conditions they applied to it so it is an impotent commandment.
Etc etc. If you change the meaning, you aren’t defying God so you can still proclaim yourself to be righteous.
Thou shalt not kill *
So you like it ruff?
Seems like a manufacturer problem. I’ve have the same LED bulbs in my house for 5 years plus with no replacements. Various makes too .Some of them came with me from my old house. No idea how old they are. With incandescent bulbs, I used to have to replace at least 1 a year. I used to keep a stock in the back of a cupboard.
I happen to have seen a documentary that says having 100 is not only possible, it gives you superpowers https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqd-_fHdTyA
You assume your proposal is an “easy” solution. The main reason I live here in the first place is because the surrounding cities, that do have amenities and public transport, are much more expensive to live in. Is not that the town I live in is large in area, it’s quite walkable, it simply doesn’t have much.
It also reminds me of a guy I used to know who said he didn’t need a watch. Claiming he didn’t need to know the time that often. But what did he do? He asked everyone around him what the time was instead. Quite often. Oh and he was usually late to class.
Why am I telling you about him? Because it is the same sentiment as “I don’t need a car, if I want to see my friends (and relatives) I simply ask them to travel to me.”
Because you are a kid and you don’t know but are pretending to be an adult. Nice try!