True, but also friends and family are usually either same age or older. ( as in the other response) I assume parents would prefer to have grandchildren, so they would not apprecheate your anti children sentiment spread by you to they’re children.
True, adoption is also a good thing generally. But to help the genetical pool be diverse and healthy some children of your own wouldnt be bad.
That implies someone had given birth to them. ( No everone has niblings.)
And who said that they’re parents would allow you to teach em your world view? ( Especially as those parents did create children and you didn’t. Hence I presume they would also like to have grandchildren. And you would discourage that.)
I do, and I agree. But also there is much more significant impacts to our enviorment. (Buildings, Planes and Cars for example). And If we stop producing offspring because of “moral” reasons, people without such reasons will create offspring and spread theyr world view to the next generation. And the next generation will still have the issues but now with less people that are able / intrested in solving the enviormental issue. ( Idocracy scenario).
I guess its up to you if you think that your world view is not worth spreading.
Well people with connections to the goverment need a way to launder money.
That is true we need to fix the problem. So in your analogy you would’ve stopped giving the person pain medication?
And how is the person crippled by pain supposed to stand, walk or excercise without pain medication?
I get it addition to pain medication is bad. I would assume most people know that, even those addicted. But the alternative is those people succumbing to pain, which would prevent any improvments.
Hence, yes I agree. Just throwing around money is not going to be the solution, but so is also not giving any.
I agree that incorrect administration of welfare can lead to that. But thats also the politicians job to manage.
Thats also comparable to saying I don’t visit doctors I fear a mistreatment.
You do. But not the politicians who actually get it into law. Also who has decided you are the spokesperson of the pro life movement?
Sounds alot like machine collaborator talk.
No, there is no definitve proof of it.
The terrorist told that they worked with someone, who provided them guns and promised a life in luxury. And Ukraine has been constantly working with random groups inside Russia, so it is a possibility, but so is ISIS.
( I question if ISIS would promise a life in luxury, but so do I question the terrorists reliability.)
Also the terrorists appear to be somewhat combat trained if you inspect the footage closer wich supports the ISIS claim.
Probability the truth is somewhere in the middle and both where somewhat involved.
(I suspect SBU wanted someone to burn the theater down and hired people that wanted a bit more than just arson. But Idk.)
And if you knew what other investors of other companies did… cough E.Island
Per the biblical description, for the souls that are damned to suffer there. How you define it is up to you.
If you acknowledge Hell. Then you also have to acknowledge thats a place of pure torment. Otherwise if you see it as a place of pure fun and party its your definition of heaven.
I like how everyone nowdays uses “cope cages” and they are still called that.
Für die Kapitulation Russlands in der Ukraine wird es bei uns immer ein offenes Ohr geben.
Eine Kapitulation kann nur von der Herrschenden Macht gestellt werden. Somit, wenn man Putins Potential für Kapitulation anerkennen würde, würde man seine Herrschaft anerkennen. Ansonsten ist das “nicht anerkennen” alles nur pseudo rückratloses geschwafel ohne Sinn für jegliches Staatswesen.
Das Genderverbot ist nicht das einzige was der Staat seinen Öffentlichendienststellen verbietet.
Also nein das Gendernverbot ist nix neues.
Linke Ideologie ist contra Imperialistisch. Einer der wichtigen Faktoren der den Sozialen Wohlstand hier erlaubt hat war die damalige Gespaltenheit der Welt in Sozialistische und Imperialistische Staaten. Dadurch konnten wir das “beste beider Welten” adoptieren und beiden Seiten drohen das man die andere mehr adoptieren wird. Nach dem Zerfall des Europäischen Sozialismus hatte man keine Spaltung mehr und alle Sozialen Reformen kamen nur noch vom Volke. Das Problem ist das der Imperialismus sich dafür nicht interessiert und bei ungenügender Gegenkraft alles mitnehmen wird was er kann. (Betrachte die Menge der Privatisierungen nach der Wiedervereinigung.)
Nach ein Paar Jahren entstand ein neuer Imperialismus im Osten. D.h. es gab wieder Konkurrenz die den Westlichen Imperialismus schwächte. Dieser ist nun dabei mit dem Westlichen Imperialismus, um eine der Bodenschätz- und Regionen in Europa zu kämpfen.
Sollte eine, egal welche Seite gewinnen ist es ein Technischer Verlust für die Linken, da wir eine super mächtige Imperialistische Macht erhalten.
Stockholm