Right. I am forget. Welcome to the club

You are European. USA will not interfere with your liberal democracy

Yes, it’s convenient. I don’t have to worry about ethno-nationalists, and chauvinists

I said “many oppositions only care about themselves” not “all oppositions only care about themselves”

Xfce, and Cinnamon. You can’t force me to choose just one.

When I say that china is just another capitalist nation, then your whataboutism to other capitalist nations does not defend china

It proves my point.

I am not interested in defending China. I want you to know that West is not holy

China heavily guides public opinion, there’s no opposition allowed.

It is good then. Many oppositions only care about themselves

I showed tank man, just literally no answer. But she asked about how Turkish Uyghurs were treated (she’s Turkish diaspora). Then it showed some very different answer than le chat mistral.

Okay. And what do you want the Chinese people to do?

Basically the answer on DeepSeek is something you guys here would copy paste lol

You’re laughing at the wrong person. I’m not a socialist

Okay I misread about the 80% figure. It’s more about 50%.

Be careful next time

It’s their industry that they want to shine in.

That is normal. USA does it too, don’t you think?

“Singapore does it”, my boss worked there and told me this week multiple times that Singaporeans are the most selfish ego centered people he has ever met. My wife grew up in Bintan, and she agrees. They are basically the Americans of south east Asia.

Why are you talking about your boss and your wife? We’re talking about Singapore which also heavily control their population

The subsidies are trickle down economics, heavily criticised by socialists.

Source?

Although income inequality is dropping in china. 0,35 Gini. In USA it’s 0,41. But here in the EU, it’s 0,29.

We’re still the most socialist.

Socialism is more than income

And thanks for links

China heavily controls their population. Just what it is.

Is it bad? Singapore do it, and west let them

Girl at work tried to use DeepSeek so I showed her some questions and then asked the same questions on le chat mistral.

A little bit of a different answer 😁

Are you talking about Tiananmen Square?

Chinese companies own 80% of cobalt in Congo. They use this to dominate the battery market

Source?

They subsidise EV and phone companies. So that I get those items on the back of Chinese tax payers.

If they are fine then that is fine

deleted by creator

Facism is a way of doing things

Fascism is an ideology, not way of doing things.

One just doesnt call them that. Leninists, maoists, stalinists, tankies

If they are fascists, why did Hitler attack them?

Has it been anticapitalist/antifascist?

Why are you saying that? And also being a capitalist does not mean being a fascist.

Has it been a proletariat-controlled society? No.

Do you get your information about China from western news medias?

Edit: adding “And also” before “being a capitalist”

I think the multiple panels would be confusing for elderly people

How can multiple panels confuse elderly people?

As I recall Ubuntu will allow to switch uutils to coreutils. So it looks like Linux Mint will continue to use coreutils

You’d better use the black one for your status tray, start menu, and clock font if it will be used by elderly people. Black is easier to see for them than gray

This is quote from their former member, Huey Long:

“They’ve got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side, but no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen”

— Huey Long, campaign speech for the re-election of Senator Hattie Caraway (D-AR), 1932 (Williams p. 589)

Source

I wonder if the “money can’t buy you happiness” people ever lived in a car.

You don’t need to live in a car to know it. Mental illness or deadly illness is enough

deleted by creator

That’s one of the reasons. Another reason is FDR painted Democratic Party as party for the workers with his social policies when served as president

However, when it comes to suppressing the Left and trying to prevent worker radicalization, they are mysteriously competent in comparison.

I think this is because of FDR