![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/fwrQkf9edg.png)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
That’s the secret to powering Linux mint.
How much the bribe is for, people would be very upset if they knew how cheap they got sold out for.
Those should be closed systems and don’t need to network with other systems and should be safe enough, its when we start networking that it becomes incredibly risky which is what neuralink is intended to do. I don’t think the average person understands how many automated attacks are flooding interconnected computers as we speak and you’re dropping someone’s brain into that and we don’t understand the scope of what can be done intentionally or unintentionally, it’s not outside the realm of possibility an automated attack trying to rapidly port scan and compromise a neuralink could overwhelm and damage the device and cause brain damage or death.
How much ram does the container use on average?
AI is only pseudo useful right now and really needs to he targeted to a specific task to be practical and even then its usually not consistent enough to be useful so it needs a lot of funding probably to the tune of billions of dollars and several years to get there. That won’t happen unless these companies developing AI get investors and you get investors by generating hype, that’s where we are now. We are hyping the shit out of AI and sticking it in everything to see what stick, unfortunately the only thing that will come out of this is businesses providing their data that employees have done for AI to train on to replace those employees.
Would they still want it if it became hackable and someone could do nefarious things to them which they no doubt will try?
It’s a propaganda mouthpiece and money laundering all rolled up into one neat package they can declare bankruptcy and wipe their hands clean.
There’s no oversight for any of these agencies and they have the means and incentive to backdoor cryptography, what would stop them from doing this morality? There’s no possible way that they both aren’t compromised and all we’re seeing now is them firing pot shots at each other trying to convince the reader to join their honeypot because its sweeter.
So by voting for a candidate other than Biden or Trump I’m taking my ball and going home?
AI is essentially an algorithm that looks at a set of data which it “trains” on and then uses that predictive model to reproduce a facsimile of an answer. An analogy would be if you took a parrot and only sever said compliments to it you would get a parrot that says compliments except it doesn’t actually understand what its saying just that it should. Knowing that, what they’re saying is that they want your data to train on so here’s some crap you don’t want or need in the hopes you think its cool or useful.
If enough people give up their data they could probably make a model that is actually useful, at which time they’ll turn it into a paid product to replace the people who were naive enough to provide their data for training.
But who decided that’s the only choice?
Other than let’s keep doing the same thing I’m open to your suggestions.
I have no doubt they fully intend to enact their vision of world domination, my point and the other person above is that democrats entire strategy is to do things they want convienient for them while they improve their lives at the expense of ours while offering up breadcrumbs and espouting that they aren’t the worst option. They could legislate changes for a fair election or ranked choice voting, but they don’t want change and they don’t care about us; they treat this like a game of good oligarch bad oligarch.
If we want to get out of this rut we need to change course, and by design we will always be on the verge of the next project 2025. If you want to analogize my actions to keeping my head in the ground I would offer that you are on merry-go-round desperately trying to steer for the right course without realizing you have no agency while on the ride.
Bottom line Plastic_Ramses is I’m tired of this shit, and I want to get off this stupid ride.
If it’s so much more dangerous this time around why wouldn’t they offer up multiple qualified candidates instead of putting all their eggs in one basket? It seems like either you’re wrong or they are.
I agree with you, but that’s exactly what they did. As others like to point out the only play he has to get away with his alleged activities is to delay until after the election, if he wins then his legal problems magically all go away or he loses and we find out if he stays to finish any legal battle or he goes the route of Edward Snowdon.
If you object and stop it you can’t ask for a mistrial.
And then it goes right out the window the first time a consumer clicks yes for uac to give admin privileges to a piece of software they don’t understand that can receive instructions remotely from the internet.
I didn’t think you could give two candidates the same ranking?