It’s worth bumping the priority up. I’m usually not that big on slice of life, but Machikado Mazoku is great.
It’s worth bumping the priority up. I’m usually not that big on slice of life, but Machikado Mazoku is great.
Don’t give your coins to politicians, kids. They’ll just become dependent and less able to survive in the wild.
Unfortunately:
However, her veto is only symbolic as the prime minister’s Georgian Dream party has enough members in parliament to override it by holding another vote.
“Clever” troll is still obvious
Food Courts Martial
How big is a Bitcoin transaction anyway?
Bitcoin block 841,308 (most recent as I’m writing this) is 1,615,771 bytes and has 3,148 transactions, for an average transaction size of ~513 bytes.
Because a Monero transaction is about one and a half to two kilobytes
So yeah, about 3 to 4 times as large as an average Bitcoin transaction.
Keep in mind we have dynamic block scaling so that the blocks will get larger as more transactions come in.
That’s not a scaling solution, though. Larger blocks provide throughput at the expense of decentralization, since fewer people will run full nodes as resource usage increases. Eventually it gets to the point where it becomes feasible for a government to track down and compromise all the remaining node operators.
It seems like lightning service providers may very well be considered money transmitters
Not sure how much this would matter. Lightning wallets don’t care whether their channel partners are registered money transmitters, or just some rando operating through TOR or in a permissive jurisdiction. In the case of Samourai, taking down the backend rendered the wallet useless. Taking out a lightning node just temporarily inconveniences users that were connected to them.
Monero may be a good option for some individual users right now, but it isn’t a long-term solution for bringing financial privacy to the masses. That pretty much has to be done through Bitcoin wallets with privacy features. Bitcoin is already criticized for not scaling well, but Monero is far worse. If I remember correctly, Monero transactions are roughly 4 times as large as Bitcoin transactions, and they don’t have any way to do off-chain transactions the way Bitcoin can with Lightning.
I think it’s actually a pretty old term. Definitely useful for the internet era though, now that we end up coming into contact with many more “interesting” characters than in the old days. xD
Possibly. I’ve seen comments from them here and there in various places, but it’s true that I haven’t had the responsibility of moderating them like you have.
HardlightCereal seemed more like a crank than a troll, to me. Cranks are by definition at least somewhat annoying, and tend to get mistaken for and treated as trolls. They’re not malicious the way trolls are though, and can be a positive influence. I think them drawing attention to this particular issue was a good thing, at least.
Ancaps: Government is bad because tyranny, we should get rid of it.
Also Ancaps: Here’s how we can still enforce copyright, abortion bans, and racial segregation without a government! 🥰
Yeah, I laughed at that bit. Big “I am not a member of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party” energy.
I love these memes that turn into threads full of vim tips. You really can do anything within vim. You can even exit vim!: !killall vim
Oh wow, I guess it doesn’t take too much. I copied your survey post over to r/nim with a “cross-posted from nim@programming.dev” link, and also invited the author of Enu to post here. I’ll keep at it.
Alright, not a bad idea.
Least active communities
- !nim
q_q
I haven’t been working on my nim project lately, so I haven’t had much to say. I’ve been missing using the language, though.
I resubscribed to r/nim on reddit just now, so if I see anything particularly interesting there I’ll cross-post it.
Microsoft-chan, you’re such a tsundere. I know all about your “Windows Subsystem for Linux”. ¬‿¬
Interesting. I was thinking more of gray area stuff than outright lying, like playing up the importance of facts that support one’s position and downplaying those that don’t.
I read somewhere a while back that it’s supposedly an evolutionary thing. In a social competition for resource allocation, confidently arguing your position regardless of its correctness is more beneficial than admitting you may be wrong.
It’s probably exacerbated by the internet, where the relative anonymity and psychological disconnection further reduces any benefits to admitting to an error.
Fellas, is it woke for YouTube to funnel viewers towards pro-fascist videos?