We should just make that standard for every candidate, every election. No closet-skeletons allowed. That would change the entire political landscape.
Mastodon: roosterboy@mastodon.social
Pixelfed: roosterboy@pixelfed.social
We should just make that standard for every candidate, every election. No closet-skeletons allowed. That would change the entire political landscape.
“rich people bad”
Lemmy: :D
“Political party (literally just a rich sellout club regardless of color) bad”
Lemmy: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)
Lol, American cops crave violence too much and UK cops don’t want to be anywhere near it. Neither are doing their damn jobs.
“Here is more evidence that our system is fundamentally broken and doesn’t serve the people who make it run anymore”
You: “How can I profit from this?”
You sound like a CEO in the making.
Let’s ban assassination too, that will show 'em!
Non-native English speakers don’t have this problem because they actually learn proper English. The problem is people who speak it naturally and don’t give a damn about proper English. After a certain point it becomes less inclusive to spew out near unreadable gibberish like the beginning of your reply.
That’s exactly what fudging rolls is though… “I’m not fudging, I’m just changing the result of the dice when it isn’t fun”
And someone WOULDN’T kill themselves if they were forced to be cis and wanted to be trans? I got news for you, pal.
But if someone makes a joke about forcing someone to be cisgender all hell breaks loose. Sounds like equality still isn’t here.
Well then they are sexist. Why does the man have to be the offensive fighter? Is Ubisoft implying men are violent and can’t be sneaky? They also seem to be implying women can’t be strong and defend themselves.
I saw a recommendation to use Firefox’s container extension https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers, but it’s disabled in private browsing windows, and I always use private browsing windows.
Then just… enable the containers in private tabs? The option is right there in the extensions menu.
Why does the black man have to be the offensive fighter? Is Ubisoft implying black people are violent and can’t be sneaky?
Exactly, it’s the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?
They also conveniently have NO information on how to register. Really seems like “going private” means “shutting down”
Why don’t you bother to take a gander at the community this post is in?
Yes, it is just a casino chip. The US dollar has been backed by jack shit for a long time.
Everyone wants an open world, nonlinear game and hates level based structure. However at the same time most people just do the main quest and maybe just a few side quests. Skyrim forced you to walk everywhere outside of the main holds while starfield is a fast travel simulator. Ironically, the way most people play Skyrim results in the same level based structure. Both games had a shit ton of side stuff to do, but Skyrim forced you to pass that stuff on the way to your objectives, while in starfield you have to consciously go out of your way to find side stuff to do on the map.
TL;DR starfield needs better flight and fuel mechanics to force you to engage in side content and spread out the objectives, and a survival mode.
Bro can’t look 1 step ahead…