AT&T told the SEC it does not believe this incident is likely to materially impact AT&T’s financial condition or results of operations.

This is part of the problem. They don’t care, and don’t think it will hurt them. Why would they? No one is holding these corporations accountable.

I’m not an expert but i believe employers have no obligation to voluntarily recognize a union. (Though it speaks volumes if they are scum that don’t want to recognize it or campaign against it… like amazon).

The national labor relations board will certify a union if 30% of eligible workers sign onto the union. If the union is certified then the employer has to recognize the union and begin bargaining.

So by not voluntarily recognizing the union, amazon is going to force them to get the union certified unless amazon folds under pressure before then. Not voluntarily recognizing the union just delays bargaining.

If I’m wrong about any of this please let me know!

Ive had mixed results with this, but one author was really excited (as was i) and we had a good back and forth for a bit after i had a chance to read/digest the paper.

You literally asked if they were that bad at logic while offering no actual refute to what they had to say. But whatever, have a nice day

Now class, over here is a blatant example of the ad hominem fallacy

It’s an ai roleplay app of some sort. The user (pink text) instructed it to say hello world in html and the ai did it. Showing the app vulnerable to prompt injections since it didn’t do any kind of validation before sending the request to chatgpt/similar and then returning the response.

Not preferred pronouns. Just pronouns

Please note that the trans community no longer uses the phrase “preferred pronouns” as it implies that trans people’s pronouns are a preference, not a fact.

https://glaad.org/reference/transgender

Op, glaad and hrc both have great resources to dig into

https://www.hrc.org/our-work/parents-for-transgender-equality-network (see supporting your trans children page)

I heard Mormons are also known as LSD cuz they use so much. Amish going to wipe the floor with them.

Also the Amish have horses

I cannot abide bestiality-adjacent people who have a disproportionally high number of groomers in their community.

Citation needed. Tbh this sounds like a fascinating dataset but I’m skeptical it even exists.

Little more info

Reportedly 2gb of data

The data includes the “full names, email addresses, passwords, and usernames” of people associating with Heritage, vio said, including users with U.S. government email addresses. “This itself can have an impact to heritage’s (sic) reputation,” they added, “and it’ll especially push away users in positions of power.”

(And thank you gay furry hackers 🫡)

Pc only but I’m in no rush. They always come down eventually 😅 plus my free time is limited atm anyway so it’s not a huge deal waiting for a better deal

Soulslike games are personal challenges. So whatever makes sense to you. but default if it is in the game then it’s fair game. If you want to do a run where you don’t use summons or limit yourself in some other way then that’s cool too. I like doing SL1 challenges. I’m terrible at it but it is fun to see how much i improve

It’s too expensive for me atm, but I’m also a patient gamer so i don’t mind waiting a few more years to see it get down even more. I didn’t think the current sale price was unreasonable compared to what i expected it to be. Just more than I’m willing to pay

deleted by creator

I think wed just need the following

• rel.id (primary key)
• rel.user_id (foreign key to person.id)
• rel.user_id2 (foreign key to person.id)
• rel.type (type of relationship)
• rel.start (non null)
• rel.end

From there you don’t need a rel.status because you’re not updating this rel.id entry except for the rel.end. if they started dating again later it would be a whole new entry, and then you could query their entire dating history to see if they keep coming back to the same person, dating around, playing the field, etc. Separately there could be a friendship relationship that is tracked so you could if they ended being friends after a breakup.

To that point a person table with a relationship table. So this way you can reference relationship between two or more persons within the relationship table and that could be joined to the person table if needed. I don’t think you’d really be able to keep it within one table while exploring multiple relationships unless you’re storing a list of ids that is interpreted outside of sql. Also a relationship table would allow exploring other types of relationships such as exes, love interests, coworkers, family, friends, etc

The article said the man had done similar with airport wifi and a place of prior employment. But the airplane one is an odd choice

Oh shit. Sad that the foundryvtt implementation looks abandoned

Ultimately, arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.

• snowden

Mullvad also put together this recently: https://mullvad.net/en/why-privacy-matters/nothing-to-hide

Based