Lol. Do you really think that Trump became president because the Left critizized Clinton too much?

I thought the Unreal Engine was running native on linux, last time I checked… 17 years ago…

Can someone explain what the chad is referencing?

Isn’t that the same thought process that could lead you to mass murder a bunch of folk? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Looks like religious conservative “pro-life” propaganda to me. ಠ_ಠ

They needed to construct additional pylons.

Should’ve thought. 😅

You might be interested in Obtainium

It’s impossible to not be condescending in that situation

Skill issue, asshole.

Why are you mad that I call your stuff about “competition” and “inefficiencies” a “liberal narrative”? That’s what the liberal market economids are supposed to be. How did you interpret it exactly?

I agree that it doesn’t achieve anything… But jeez, let people have their fun. It’s not like anybody confuses this shit with actual activism.

Stephanie Sterling once said that he could be considered a god with all the power our society lets him have.

He has absolutely no frame of reference of what it is like to be an actual human with bills to pay and chores to do.

Which is what make dunking on him so satisfying. I can’t hurt Bill Gates’ feelings by making mean memes about him. But Musk reacts to people being mean to him.

Not enough of the money goes to the artist, but money does go to the artists. If you’re not sure, ask literally any artist who has their content featured on netflix, or any of the other platforms.

Really depends on the industry. E.g for games: The devs were already payed their salary and usually don’t get residuals. Here the money goes to the publisher/studio. As I already said: I pay for the indie games I play singe I want these studios to be able to exist/pay their devs. But the money I’d spend on Call of Duty will mostly go to Bobby Kotick and his shareholders.

Money also goes to the marketing team, and software developers, and internationalization teams, and all the other people in the chain who actually do have a purpose and make that artist’s content more available to the world than it otherwise would be.

Those people don’t get residuals, but wages. Yes, the money has to come from somewhere. But the animators of a Netflix show I’m watching where already payed. Yes, the people currently working on stuff that will come out in the future still need wages, but let’s not forget that most of the money I’d pay will go to shareholders.

But they’re always going to take more than they should, that’s just called inefficiency, and is where competition can happen. But if it’s not generating enough income, the content simply won’t happen.

I don’t really care for this liberal narrative.

Which is honestly fine with me, lord knows we have too much garbage on these platforms.

So, people who make that “garbage” don’t deserve to pay their rent? Either be defending the poor workers or be a market extremist. Pick a lane, my dog.

that you should pay what you can afford.

I don’t think people should be ripped off though. Which is what I think is happening with the big platforms.

I did (skimmed it, at least) and I liked it. 🙃

If you are so sure that you are right and already “know it all”, why bother and even read this? There is no comment section to argue.

I beg to differ. You utter fool! You created a comment section yourself on lemmy and you are clearly wrong about everything!

You take the mean of 1 and 9 which is 4.5!

/j

Don’t get me wrong: I pay for my indie games and don’t have the time for the so-called “triple-AAA” crap.

But the money I’d pay to Netflix or Spotify won’t actually go to the artists who worked on the stuff. That’s just not how this works.

Most imortantly: I don’t want to shame anyone for pay/not paying, as I usually don’t know their financial situtation.

And yet: Netflix prevents me from recording any of their shows and sharing the recording with my friends and family.

Great! Let’s do that for any type of media!

When you’re paying, you’re not buying the fuel nor are the salaries directly affected by one person is paying for riding a train.

What you’re describing is called “marginal cost” and reducing this is the reason why the economics of any large scale business is actually working. You could argue with these marginal costs, but you’d be entering a completely different model/domain of economics. And no one uses this model which is abstract/non-abstract in any aspect that happens to make your point valid.

Counter question: Do you think that running libraries is theft?