• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle




  • There’s really no perfect standard for length in any format. I read on my phone so one page to you may be 5 pages to me.

    I could see the word standard itself being the only reliable format. Like Standard Ebook uses as a measure for book length, but it may be hard to adopt generally.

    “I read 567,000 words last month,” may come off oddly. But certainly not unreasonable.

    “Let’s do a 200,000 word/month challenge!”


  • PanaX@lemmy.worldtoBooks@lemmy.mlA book across the year
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I like the idea of having one big book to read in a year. I have done that with East of Eden and the Glass Bead Game. Both of which are meaty epic books. I tackled them initially as a rebellion against the short attention span world we live in. Even in reading niches, I all too often see reading challenges that set # of book goals. I think it’s absurd to claim that someone has read 20 books in a year that are short, verses one long book. The former is often applauded while the latter is not.

    Karamazov has been one that I’ve been wanting to read all my life, so maybe I’ll attempt it in 2024 myself.

    Non linear writing is a struggle for me, but I try to challenge myself with it. I’m currently reading The Waves by Virginia Woolf which is incredibly abstract but beautiful. I assume Gravity’s Rainbow to be similar. But it’s a thick book too.


  • Understood.

    I’m simply trying to highlight that what happened to the native Americans is not simply “an aside,” or a footnote in history but that it should take a sharp focus to what the US is or has been. This isn’t about competing special interest group atrocities, but a fundamental question that is at the core of representative democracy. Too often liberal democracy is simply another way to exploit others, and disallow “other” groups from participating.

    From a native perspective, living on a reservation in the US currently, it wouldn’t matter much if it was run by republicans or democrats, as they both simply ignore treaties and obligations. From your perspective, it’s a dire existential crises, but to those who have been swept aside both in the past and the present, it doesn’t matter much at all.


  • PanaX@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know how you can separate the idea of colonialism from the formation of the US. Seems arbitrary and without any philosophical basis.

    As it stands currently, black Americans have better standards of living, in almost all developmental indices, than native Americans. So by any scientific inquiry, native Americans have had it and still have it much harder than black Americans.