Removed by mod

Yes, big companies might care, depending on how they see this as a security issue. If they don’t, then it’s doesn’t matter. It’s all up to them.

I don’t think it would be possible to show original artwork. Highly unlikely.

Removed by mod

We celebrate?

Don’t you understand that everything bad is ai?

It would probably just be microplastics by then?

Best not to take anything from Russel brand too seriously.

In a post below someone shared an article about it.

But generally I don’t speak in a way to add a peer reviewed scientific study below everything I say. Nobody does. Because it would be incredibly stupid and inefficient to do it, especially under some irrelevant comment in an irrelevant thread no one besides us will ever read. Incredibly stupid.

Sure, but then you could say that about almost everything. It would be very hard to imagine someone getting addicted to ghb. I have never heard of that.

I think when talking about drugs we have to be truthful. Especially to kids. Exaggerating and trying to scare with some imaginary addictive properties doesn’t work, because when some of them figure out it’s all a lie, they will not recognize other harmful patterns of behavior that might truly get them addicted.

Speaking facts is promoting?

It’s a bit dangerous, mainly because of difficulties dosing, but it’s not addictive at all.

This thing has been around for decades.

I haven’t seen 60s before. I understood like it depends on the activity.

Perhaps it will already know which kink you want before you even do. 🤣

Yes, I wasn’t precise. I assumed we all understand it’s about the money.

I misunderstood you. I thought you meant in general.

I don’t think this is really meant to be a memory function. From this function an incredible dataset of epic proportions will be created of user computer behaviours and how certain software is used. Openai will then get metadata to train ai that will be able to use any software and do anything on a computer and understand and mimic all possible stuff. I don’t think they will literally sell the data, but in some way this will be used to train ai, probably with metadata of it. Honestly I don’t see a big deal. I guess it has to be like that. I think it would be fair to make all ai opensource since it’s trained on everyone, but for sure that’s not going to happen. But I prefer to have it than not.

With this attitude there would be no progress ever.

I know Linux is big on lemmy and I adore Linux, I use it on my home server and laptop. But the way of the world is ai. For 30 years I have been imagining having a computer that will be able to predict what I want and we are well on our way to that exact place. It’s prudent to mind potential security weaknesses, but dismissing it so quickly as some people do is just as dumb as it gets.

Ai on the computer will change the way we use computers. This function is just one of many that will make it happen. It’s going to be awesome.