Huh. Guess I’m gay. 👍
Huh. Guess I’m gay. 👍
I’ve been using boost for what seems like a decade. I’ll give thunder a try. Thanks.
Interesting. I’m using boost and your comment isn’t spoiler tagged for me. That’s also how mine is currently formatted. Shame since this app has a spoiler tag button that appears to match the format.
I’ve tried every variation and it’s not working. This is definitely the most complicated spoiler tag system I’ve seen.
Yeah I can’t get any of them to work. Do you know what Lemmy uses?
Uhh I played this game. It’s literally the plot of ::: spoiler Title Spoiled game :::
Fuck yeah. I wish I could get my friends to play this mod with me.
Which general?
They are also allowed happiness, but only vindictive happiness at another’s expense.
Agreed. Same for AOC for me. But this country is on the verge of electing Trump again. A woman of color had zero chance, unfortunately. :(
At least not without a longer public term of popularity.
What the hell? I’ve not heard that yet. What asinine reason are they peddling?
Everyone should vote, all the time. It’s your right and duty. Everyone deserves a say.
FCC already has regulations on maximum power. These emitters are usually dozens of feet off the ground as well.
I don’t have any clothes that need to be ironed. If I buy a shirt it comes out of the dryer wrinkled, it’s fucking gone. Ain’t nobody got time for that shit.
AAF is getting to work on a new mission: “Project Sovereignty 2025”.
Backed with a $100,000 grant from the Heritage Foundation, an influential rightwing thinktank, AAF will compile information, including social media posts, about civil servants they suspect will “obstruct and sabotage a future conservative president”. They plan to publish dossiers on those non-public facing individuals, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, and expose them to scrutiny.
This is the start of fascism. It leads into Project 2025.
Anyone who is undecided is just ok with a felonious president. Or more likely they are for Trump but too embarrassed to say so.
The question anyone suggesting replacing Biden needs to answer is: Who?
Pretty much the entire electorate needs to know who the person is. They need to be somewhat popular. They need no real scandals.
That’s just the bare minimum to complete with Biden. Then you have to answer: can they be popular enough, or overcome Biden’s weaknesses enough to overcome incumbency bias?
That’s not easy to answer but if the answer isn’t a resounding Yes, then replacing him is a mistake.
And the candidate has to be popular enough that Biden is willing to stand down and support them. Because he has pledged delegates and several primaries already.
Overall I think this would be a mistake. There just aren’t any good alternatives. And one bad debate isn’t a scandal. This is letting the Fox News machine dictate how we think about Biden. Which is always a mistake.
No one even knows who they are. Harris and Buttigieg are the best well known and neither stand a chance.
This also applies to law enforcement agencies like ice, right? Border patrol? They are all only able to enforce actual laws right?
Choosing to take money and work for Putin is quite a bit different than having a salary from a corporation. Equating the two is apologizing for dictators.
♥️