Poor bees which were lost during this kind of activity.

I guess the username explains the response totally.

Not to be smart, but just in conclusion: it’d have been pretty special, if they had broken down Linux and Windows with the same patch.

Wait until you learn about CrowdStrike breaking Linux systems as well.

Just kidding, no need to wait, here’s one article about it: https://www.neowin.net/news/crowdstrike-broke-debian-and-rocky-linux-months-ago-but-no-one-noticed/

Kiitos ja kumarrus ilmoituksestasi. 👍

Yeah, I know. It is a source code file…

Doesn’t look like the executable you are trying to run is with executable rights.

chmod +x ch34x.c

And retry.

(I don’t have any knowledge of this driver or installing it. Just wanted to give some directions.)

Leave it up, please.

I didn’t want to sound like that one person, who doesn’t appreciate these posts.

Hmm, seems almost like this one: https://sopuli.xyz/post/14327640

The share is, of course, appreciated.

Objective: coordinate gift article sharing

AI in the tent:

LMDE <3

Glad you asked. To be clear: I agree with your original comment.

I had this great, long, message drafted in my mind while in sauna, but I discarded (forgot) that one when I got back to the computer.

Let me elaborate my first reply. We have in the OP image the following actors: Musk and the challenger.

I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

• (#1) According to my previous knowledge about Musk’s interactions wherever in the world of Internet, I have come to the conclusion he is not the one to be convinced even with proof.
• (#2) If someone can challenge him during the interaction, he will most likely (always) counteract with snarky responses or just ignore the challenger totally. Like seen in the OP image.
• (#3) The challenger tried to convince him with proof.

If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

• (#4) Whilst the challenger commenced #3, he was really proofing the point/educating the public of the #1.

I like to think I managed to represent the Musk-like interaction in my previous reply; responding to your well built message with a snarky comment. Although, I think, I went too far with the dual interpretations.

E: Why is your reply being down-voted? My previous should be the more down-voted one. I also made a little correction to this message.

Are those two things not the same?

Thanks for the clarification.

I’m from Finland, where even the idea of knowing who voted or not is totally absurd.

I wasn’t joking, just wondering if that it could be true.

I’m from Finland, where even the idea is totally absurd.

Is it true, though, the voting record being public?

I think there are some grateful rescuees because of this action.

That’s some bravery by the other Bradley crew.

Do not question, just obey.

Fiksua puhetta, mutta taas nämä hienot sanat ja lauseet sortuvat siihen “miksei edellinen”. No ‘miksei edelliset 4x’, mikä vasta pitäisikin huolestuttaa.

Tilastot puhuvat Urpon hallituksen tekemiä muutoksia vastaan, esimerkiksi työllisyyden lisäämiseksi. Mutta ainahan sitä voidaan vedota niihin tilastoihin ja kuka mitäkin sitten niistä linjaa.

Eipä siis heittäydytä lapsellisiksi (ei ole lapsia, joten pitäisikö siis vaihtaa ‘lapsettomiksi’), mutta nyt ei korjata “Urpoa”.

Tukihenkilötoiminta on tarkoitettu lapsille, jotka tarvitsevat turvallista kodin ulkopuolista aikuista.

– Runsaat kaksi vuotta olemme tavanneet noin kerran viikossa, mutta nyt nämä hallituksen leikkaukset tekevät sellaisen muutoksen, että itse asiassa rahapuoli kääntyy miinusmerkkiseksi tässä tukihenkilötoiminnassa, huokaa Tommi Iivonen.

Hyvin menee.