![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3d9e0457-3afb-4203-98e1-35253454ecbe.png)
Republicans only like bribery for rich people, not poor people.
Republicans only like bribery for rich people, not poor people.
The only thing that’s actually exhaustive here is Dougie’s pathetic and blatantly corrupt attempts to screw Ontarians and deprive them of a valuable public good for the sake of pleasing his developer buddies.
Believe me it’s as pathetic as it sounds.
Easiest way to get laughed out of the courtroom when you attempt to use it as a legal defense.
The study itself highlights that this is a correlation, not evidence of direct causation. Still, evidence of a correlation with worsened outcomes for newborns is concerning in itself.
The only reason I can think of that EPA would act like this is regulatory capture.
You used a VPN… Right?
Not too hard to achieve after seeing how dead set Musk is on killing Twitter…
Nothing a VPN can’t solve
If we’re lucky he’ll piss off his Russian contacts and end up falling out a window by accident.
More likely is that this puppet will be used by bad actors to advance their agendas and as usual he’ll distract everybody from the actual bad shit happening.
So what I read is that TPUSA enables useful idiots.
Stop giving attention whores what they want, for fuck’s sake. It’s like getting mad at Facebook comments which I thought we’d all learned was useless a decade ago.
It’s simply part of an effort to impose moral beliefs on a world that to them, appears to work without them. Bringing order to chaos. Kind of like the Christian beliefs underpinning such cruelty.
Who the hell would want to live in a republican hellhole like this
This issue has been explored previously, and with a better example of the trolley problem that centers the ethical dilemma entirely on the autopilot.
I do agree that in most situations, the driver retains full control over the vehicle, and therefore remains fully responsible, even if there’s a case to be made that the autopilot neglected the safety of others outside the car.
However, I’d also argue that this example leaves a possibility where fault cannot be assigned to them: If the driver became aware of the hazards at a reasonable time (i.e. spotting the pedestrians just around a sharp bend, rather than 200m down a straightaway), and made every reasonable effort to stop within that time but could not. There are limits to the driver’s responsibility, but the most interesting cases are crashes that the autopilot is capable of preventing (even if the driver reasonably cannot), but fails to do so.
Bro, is this really the time for that 💀
Fuck Shoppers. High dispensing fees mean literally anybody else can do it better. Switch to your local pharmacy.
Disappointing to hear of this. He had a sharp tongue and I liked some of his critiques when he was still writing occasional columns for the Globe and Mail, but I didn’t realize he already lost his journalistic integrity…
Consider a sleep study. I found out I have sleep apnea this way, and did a follow up study with a CPAP machine where I just felt 100x better rested than usual. Ask your doctor for a referral.
It’s so bloody stupid that a Loblaws owned grocery store gets to keep the name of Independent. Why do we tolerate this dystopian double-speak?
Anyways boycotting isn’t viable for me so “shrinkage” will have to do.
Defend your stuff with a gun, and watch how fast police respond.
Pathetic. If I had to start over, I’d go into petty theft as well, knowing how poorly it’s policed.