Have you read the article? Hydrogen is developed… fast…
The strategy is being implemented, infrastructure being build. Electrolysers and hydrogen ready NGs are planed and build. New NG infrastructure is hydrogen ready. What else are you expecting? Should things magically materialise?
Now you are getting away from arguments…
Well… It’s the current strategy.
Also, the same could be said about NG [efficiency about 30%-55% and also a little bit flameable].
In the EU, hydrogen. Either by fuel cell or burnt in hydogen ready NG plants. Wouldn’t be my first choice but thats whats gonna happen.
I can’t but it’s also not necessary. There are no conditions were no energy from renewables is produced. You have to cover peaks and shift electricity around a bit. The missing parts are interconnection and, dependend on price, overbuilding.
Pumped hydro, hydrogen, batteries. The solutions are readily deployable and economcally viable.
Austria has it! It’s called the Klimaticket.
Yeah, and thats the reason why you are a “conservative”.
“Conservatives” are usually right wing extremists, thats the same everywhere.
Corruption
Utility PV in Australia has a capacity factor of ~25%. So those six GW of PV will produce approximately the same amount of energy as the biggest nuclear reactor in Europe Olkiluoto 3 which took 18 years to build instead of 2.5.
Wer mit gendern die AFD wählt, wählt auch ohne gendern die AFD…