You can go be like Jesus on your own dime if you care

Hey there, OP! You still haven’t addressed this from our last interaction, about the Presidency being covered by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/lsb/lsb10569

Specifically:

One scholar notes that the drafting history of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment suggests that the office of the President is covered:

During the debate on Section Three, one Senator asked why ex-Confederates “may be elected President or Vice President of the United States, and why did you all omit to exclude them? I do not understand them to be excluded from the privilege of holding the two highest offices in the gift of the nation.” Another Senator replied that the lack of specific language on the Presidency and Vice- Presidency was irrelevant: “Let me call the Senator’s attention to the words ‘or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States.’”

I’ll highlight that last bit again:

Another Senator replied that the lack of specific language on the Presidency and Vice- Presidency was irrelevant: “Let me call the Senator’s attention to the words ‘or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States.’”

That is from this paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3748639

So does that satisfy your curiosity, or are you still going to run around asking why every government role wasn’t listed in this section? Because it’s kinda hard to believe you stand for any kind of law or order, when you dismiss the foundation of all law and order in this country that is the Constitution and oppose its application in our society.

Aw, what was uncivil about my post? All I did was point out that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment expressly includes the office of the President!

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/lsb/lsb10569

Specifically:

One scholar notes that the drafting history of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment suggests that the office of the President is covered:

During the debate on Section Three, one Senator asked why ex-Confederates “may be elected President or Vice President of the United States, and why did you all omit to exclude them? I do not understand them to be excluded from the privilege of holding the two highest offices in the gift of the nation.” Another Senator replied that the lack of specific language on the Presidency and Vice- Presidency was irrelevant: “Let me call the Senator’s attention to the words ‘or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States.’”

That is from this paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3748639

See? Nothing uncivil 😊

I was the victim of an insurrection on the highway a couple months back. That damn construction equipment hauler cracked my damn window with a small rock. It’s literally the end of our democracy!

I hadn’t pegged you for a holocaust denier, but it certainly lines up with your intelligence

I also love imagining things that never happened

Excuse me mine was the violation? not the guy who’s contributing nothing but hollow mocking?

In all the towns with republican mayors and republican council members, in republican counties in states with republican governors and republican legislatures, with republican controlled congress for much of our recent history, why are so many republican citizens unable to prosper?

Vote for whoever or whatever you want, it won’t magically make a town economically prosperous. Democrats won’t bring deep water shipping ports to nowhereville. Progressive policies won’t bring back small towns where the resources dried up. That stuff just isn’t how it works.

Could it possibly be because of…republican policy?

Like the republican policy under Reagan and Schwarzenegger that significantly contributed to making California into the economic powerhouse it is today? Or are we just supposed to ignore that because it doesn’t fit your narrative?

Lmao how did I go crazy? You’re the deluded schitzo who kept seeing things nobody said. Forgot to take your meds this evening?

Sorry for not just letting his brazen slander go unchecked

Cool, I don’t care what a bunch of nobody pinkos make up to justify their shit

Lmao keep up the bullshit, troll. Nobody believes your crap.

Reading imaginary meanings that you made up to desperate prevent anything from challengong your views isn’t a good thing

Way to demonstrate you’re fundamentally incapable of reading

I already explained the gist of it. Fuck off

Typical of you to just make shit up I didn’t say. I never said I don’t know why it’s funny. I said I don’t have an encyclopedic knowledge of the specific origins of it. I can’t link you to the first HitlerCunnyRape or the first meme about it. That doesn’t mean I don’t understand the culture that it comes from and the context around it.

My guy, there has literally never once been a joke that’s funny after someone needed it explained in depth. Tenfold for jokes based on years of discourse and culture developed in somewhat insular and niche communities. Odds are, you’re never going to find this funny, no matter how much I explain it.

And I’m not riding your ass about your username, so how about you get off mine

I’m not an encyclopedia of internet culture. I have zero clue what the specific origins of the name are. As far as I’ve seen, it’s based on the comedic principle of breaking percieved expectations. See, the"far right" are typically not known for being supportive of highly sexualized and “degenerate” culture. Thus, someone with “Hitler” in their username would not also be expected to talk about things like “cunny rape”. There’s also the base shock value humor derived from the name being overall inappropriate in nature.

It’s a common joke username in the online Anime community

Yeah, conservatives have a sense of humor. Unlike you freaks