FreeFacts

As bad as Trump is, he isn’t championing and encouraging extrajudicial killings (at least not yet) like Duterte. That is however something your average Filipino voters were drawn to and supported with thunderous applause.

Philippines is a shithole that willingly elected the fascist Duterte as their president, they deserve no support.

It was utter horse crap when it released. The military green Steam was among the worst pieces of software ever conceived. So they worked a lot to make it as good as it is today.

I think it’s ironic this is posted here on Lemmy, which is what it is today mainly thanks to users of another service freaking out over how they will manage without their API access to bullshit aggregated content mixed with astroturfing.

Hienoa ettei antanut vihapostin lannistaa itseään!

Tuli kuitenkin vääjäämättä mieleen että tekisikö Yleisradio samanlaista juttua 60-vuotiaasta äijästä, joka fanittaisi vaikka JPop-idoleita. Itsestäni tuntuu että ei, vaan silloin meidän yhteiskunnan “virallinen mielipide” olisi vihaajien puolella.

I know of one use case that seems viable, there is a digital housing market service in my country (called Dias). It uses blockchain to verify transactions related to selling and buying houses. That includes proof of sales, ownership, bank transaction status etc. The blockchain is operated by all the major banks. Their incentive is that it increases the security of the transactions thanks to the immutable digital trail, and also the fact that no single entity owns the “database” so no entity can alter it, or skim service fees etc from the others.

Why this hasn’t been done is pretty baffling to me.

Because the blockchain needs an incentive. Who is going to be taking part in the blockchain if there is nothing in it for them? That’s why these tokens are often tied to crypto currencies, as mining is the incentive.

Now they want to remove all protections against firing people. People should be fireable without giving any reason.

Why do people do this? Go to the internet and spread lies, that is.

Email standard sucks anyway. By the official standard, User@email.com and user@email.com should be treated as separate users…

What really started the whole “fi-sci” (fiction-science) on Discovery was Mythbusters. I know many people don’t want to hear it as they loved the show, but it was often very unscientific, especially their methods and the hasty and often false conclusions they made from their scientifically invalid tests.

It’s interesting debate to observe from my perspective as my native tongue has no different pronunciations for letters, they are always the same regardless of their placement in words. G is always pronounced the same, and so is P. (Spoiler: it’s hard G and hard P).

This brought another thing in my mind about soft G. Let’s take for example Gin, which is with soft G I believe (it’s hard G here because there is only hard G). Then there is the acronym GT for Gin & Tonic. The question is, in English language countries, is the acronym pronounced jay-T instead of gee-T?

Jotenkin hassua että vuosikymmen taaksepäin tämä ukko kolkutteli henkilövaaleissa (presidentinvaalit 2012) kakkoskierroksen ovia puolella miljoonalla äänellä, mutta on nykyään lähinnä yksinomaan surullinen ilmestys aikalailla kaikkien mielestä.

While there is plenty of debate about abortion, its legality & justification, there is no such debate that I’m aware of about rape.

There actually is, but it is not on the same level. It’s on the definition level, as in what constitutes as rape. And believe me, there are lots of people who will be in agreement that rape is a terrible act, but will also defend a rapist because the legal definition of rape doesn’t match what they perceive as rape.

There are people who don’t respect the judgement or voice of people who have abortions, or provide them. The former probably ask about the latter “why should we allow them to vote” too. That just emphasizes the fact that personal feelings are not good enough reason to limit a right. The right to vote should be the basis. As a right it needs no justification, on the contrary, any limitations to it are the ones that need to be justified. And justified better than “I don’t respect this and that”.

Voin kuvitella kuinka toimittaja on toimituksessa hykerrellyt kun on päässyt otsikkoa väsäämään. :)

Niin no, meidän perustuslakiin kirjatut oikeudetkin toimii samalla tavoin. Jopa ihmisten yhdenvertaisuudesta lain edessä sallitaan joustaa “hyväksyttävällä perusteella”, mitä toki ei määritellä missään.

Vielä enemmän ihmetyttää se, kuinka moni nuorempi äänesti kokoomusta tai persuja, kun hallituksen tavoitteet ovat suoraan esim opiskelijan elämänlaadun vastaisia.

Itseäni ei se juurikaan ihmetytä, kun juuri nuorten tulevaisuudella edellinen hallitus mälläili 44 miljardin lisä euron edestä. Ja ei sitäkään edeltäneitä hallituksia voi kehua.

Mutta nykyhallituksen lupaukset olivat ihan puuta heinää myös, alijäämä on silti 11 miljardia ja muutostenkin jälkeen puhutaan ihan liian isosta summasta. Leikattiin siis liian vähän. Neljän vuoden päästä 30+ miljardia taas lisää lainattu nuorten tulevaisuudesta. Hommaan maksaa jo nyt pelkkinä korkoina miljardeja vuodessa, ja ne kulut kasvaa jokaisen lainaeuron myötä.

Why the police and prosecution and not the jury? It’s their duty to determine guilt, isn’t it?

But you don’t believe in anything? Not all beliefs are supernatural. There is no objective fact of what is morally right or wrong for example, there is no science behind those concepts, yet you probably still have some beliefs on what you perceive is morally right and what isn’t. Or if you do not, you are a sociopath.

The first point is a non issue. If we just stop for a second and think about it, the calorie output of the animals has to be less than the calorie input. Otherwise they would generate energy out of thin air. The bigger thing is that they are also homeothermic animals, which means that majority of the input calories are used to regulate body heat and not to generate output calories (aka meat). From calorie persective, going through homeothermic animals is pure waste of energy.