If you think we should be galvanizing, why attack me? Why shit on me and my country? You’re “peace” rings very hollow right now.

There’s nothing wrong with bugs. It’s all about intent, and he clearly intended to hide this from her because he knew (correctly) it would be a problem for her. So it was a lie by withholding relevant information. About their daughters name. Its messed up. It’s also dumb because it’s so easy to look up the origin of a name that this “secret” isn’t really one at all.

“Make your country stronger so you’re not beholden to the us! Omg your country is such crap.”

This is what you sound like, btw. It’s just shitting on America and Americans, you aren’t really saying anything productive.

Usually for me it’s I have to check with my wife about the question…and then forget about it I’ll never think of it again until it’s far too late.

Poes law

We all agree that people who organize religions can do so goe nefarious reasons. But the argument was that you can’t trust religious people because they are irrational…but then if they call themselves spiritual, well that doesn’t really count.

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/12/what-causes-sea-level-rise/

Might change when all of the ice melts, but to this point it contributes twice as much per year, per NASA. If you have some other source I would be interested in reading it.

You’re going to nit pick spiritual vs religious? If we’re being pedantic, you’re citing us population, the world is much different. Also even if we accept it’s only about half, my point still stands.

When in reality the sea levels will rise because warm water expands.

Just FYI, sea levels are going to rise primarily because much of the melting ice is not floating in the water, but land based. Thermal expansion is definitely part of it, but secondary.

I’m sure there have been plenty of times you have comfortably trusted a religious person with responsibility because most people are religious.

I was an engineer is school. I’ve always been good at fluffing up my writing, but it always annoyed me that I had to make things longer when I felt like I was already done.

When one of my first engineering reports said “this has to be no more than 2 pages long” as opposed to “at least” I knew I had chosen the right school. Lol

I’m not even sure what you’re arguing anymore.

Are you actually trying to say you did not say “They didn’t decide”? Because it’s right there, just a few posts up. Literally word for word.

Are you really not smart enough to just go look back after I told you you said it? Or are you just grossly dishonest? Who are you lying for here? You can’t honestly believe you can gaslight, because it’s still right there for me to look at.

I love how you won’t even admit that you weren’t quoting me, and that you were clearly indicating that they had rigged the other election, but then have the nerve to say I’m being academically dishonest. Lol classic projection.

Lol, the reason it’s in quotes is because it’s quoting you.

It’s in quotes because I was quoting you. If it had been in quotes when I quoted it from you, I would have done something like “‘They didn’t decide.’” Although I wouldn’t have even done that, because I’m honest and not trying to be right. I would have wondered why I misinterpreted it. You don’t strike me as all that dumb, but to not even go and look three posts up to see if you had quoted it seems incredibly dumb, especially if you are basing your whole argument on it.

I never claimed anything was “rigged”

You literally linked to two people saying it was rigged with the link text “they didn’t decide” and are now trying to argue that you never claimed it was rigged. This is amazing. You’ve got yourself so tied up trying to be right or trying not to be wrong, rather than figure out what’s right, that you don’t even know which way’s up anymore.

What are you referring to, exactly?

My dude, you are the one making claims.

I used the word argument, not claims. Are you suggesting you aren’t making an argument?

Again… Manufactured consent. Why would two senior politicians make claims and then backtrack upon them without admitting they were wrong in the first place?

So, how exactly did they rig it? You’re making some vague claims, but can point to nothing.

Are you pretending that’s been your argument up to this point?

Btw, why didn’t you point out that both of them backtracked the comments?

They didn’t decide. The people voted for Clinton and then Biden, overwhelmingly. Because that’s the type of candidate they believe they want. Remember, sanders didnt drop out, he lost. Overwhelmingly so.

So you’re saying because the winner was someone more representative of who the average Democrat voted, sanders got screwed.